Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes 3.2 dnsmasq update?

2017-10-09 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 08:04:21PM -0600, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote: > On 10/08/2017 07:27 AM, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote: > > On October 7, 2017 10:43:55 PM MDT, Reg Tiangha > > wrote: > > > On 2017-10-07 1:19 PM, Ron

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes 3.2 dnsmasq update?

2017-10-08 Thread Ron Hunter-Duvar
On 10/08/2017 07:27 AM, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote: On October 7, 2017 10:43:55 PM MDT, Reg Tiangha wrote: On 2017-10-07 1:19 PM, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote: ... It's weird, but it seems like every distro *but* Fedora has released an updated version or version with a

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes 3.2 dnsmasq update?

2017-10-08 Thread Ron Hunter-Duvar
On October 7, 2017 10:43:55 PM MDT, Reg Tiangha wrote: >On 2017-10-07 1:19 PM, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote: > >> Well, I did all this, and confirmed that the sys-* servicevms are all >> using Fedora 25, but it still has dnsmasq version 2.76. According to >> US-CERT, 2.78 is

[qubes-users] Re: Qubes 3.2 dnsmasq update?

2017-10-07 Thread Reg Tiangha
On 2017-10-07 1:19 PM, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote: > Well, I did all this, and confirmed that the sys-* servicevms are all > using Fedora 25, but it still has dnsmasq version 2.76. According to > US-CERT, 2.78 is needed to get the vulnerability fixes. Which concerns > me, given the length of time