Re: [qubes-users] Security advantages of static DVMs for sys-VMs?

On Thursday, 16 July 2020 20:48:52 UTC+8, unman wrote: > > 54th - static disposableVMS are neither unstable nor hard to use. They > are as stable as a normal sys-VM and transparent in use. > Unman, you're right. I was being overly cautious and, to be frank, scared of making my OS more

Re: [qubes-users] Security advantages of static DVMs for sys-VMs?

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:26:04PM +0200, Peter Funk wrote: > fiftyfourthparal...@gmail.com asked: > > I read about running sys-vms as static disposable VMs on the Qubes > > documentation site > > , > >

Re: [qubes-users] Security advantages of static DVMs for sys-VMs?

fiftyfourthparal...@gmail.com asked: > I read about running sys-vms as static disposable VMs on the Qubes > documentation site > , > > then on the Whonix guide to Qubes security >

[qubes-users] Security advantages of static DVMs for sys-VMs?

Hi there, I read about running sys-vms as static disposable VMs on the Qubes documentation site , then on the Whonix guide to Qubes security . I