Re: [qubes-users] Valid Concerns Regarding Integrity of Whonix Project

Feb 23, 2019, 3:50 AM by patrick-mailingli...@whonix.org: > Reminds me, would be good to have OpenPGP signed websites all over the > internet. Unfortunately there is no project working towards it. > > https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Dev/OpenPGP_Signed_Website >

Re: [qubes-users] Valid Concerns Regarding Integrity of Whonix Project

Reminds me, would be good to have OpenPGP signed websites all over the internet. Unfortunately there is no project working towards it. https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Dev/OpenPGP_Signed_Website -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To

Re: [qubes-users] Valid Concerns Regarding Integrity of Whonix Project

Hi, I'm the 'mig5' referred to in the original post. A couple things keep appearing in this and the other thread that need debunking. Constant reference to 'the dev', 'dev handing over keys', etc. I'm not a dev on the Whonix project. Patrick already covered this in his reply - really all

Re: [qubes-users] Valid Concerns Regarding Integrity of Whonix Project

Feb 16, 2019, 4:08 AM by xa...@protonmail.com: > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Friday, February 15, 2019 10:58 PM, <> qubes-...@tutanota.com > > > wrote: > >> Dear Patrick, >> >> I appreciate your answer and

Re: [qubes-users] Valid Concerns Regarding Integrity of Whonix Project

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, February 15, 2019 10:58 PM, wrote: > Dear Patrick, > > I appreciate your answer and understand your point of view. On the other > side, the issue raised by the law in Australia (and GCHQ asked for that too, >

Re: [qubes-users] Valid Concerns Regarding Integrity of Whonix Project

Dear Patrick, I appreciate your answer and understand your point of view. On the other side, the issue raised by the law in Australia (and GCHQ asked for that too, like the request of ghost user in all the "encrypted" conversations) is an important security concern and should be taken into

Re: [qubes-users] Valid Concerns Regarding Integrity of Whonix Project

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * I was advised in private e-mail by @mig5 about this new law before it took effect beforehand, and @mig5 offered to step aside because of it. It was my decision to not to change anything. Below I will explain why. * I might have reacted in a

Re: [qubes-users] Valid Concerns Regarding Integrity of Whonix Project

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 04:29:45PM +1100, haaber wrote: > Are canaries now "illegal" in Aussi law as well ??? > > On 2/14/19 3:26 PM, teresardavida...@gmail.com wrote: > > Summary: I have reason to believe the possibility that Mig5 (the new > > SysAdmin on Whonix project) could be compelled

Re: [qubes-users] Valid Concerns Regarding Integrity of Whonix Project

Are canaries now "illegal" in Aussi law as well ??? On 2/14/19 3:26 PM, teresardavida...@gmail.com wrote: Summary: I have reason to believe the possibility that Mig5 (the new SysAdmin on Whonix project) could be compelled under federal law to provide assistance is high and the threat to the

[qubes-users] Valid Concerns Regarding Integrity of Whonix Project

Summary: I have reason to believe the possibility that Mig5 (the new SysAdmin on Whonix project) could be compelled under federal law to provide assistance is high and the threat to the security and anonymity offered by the project could be compromised as a result is also high. I recently