Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 5:58:33 PM UTC+1, Ivan Mitev wrote: > On 03/09/2018 06:42 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: > > I added a repository for Community Discussions, and pinned it at the top. > > Something like this is good for everyone? > >

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On 03/09/2018 06:42 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: > I added a repository for Community Discussions, and pinned it at the top. > Something like this is good for everyone? https://github.com/Qubes-Community-Collaboration/Community-Discussions/issues/1 :) -- You received this message because you are

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 5:32:48 PM UTC+1, Ivan Mitev wrote: > On 03/09/2018 05:54 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: > > The Organization feature of GitHub seems to solve many of our problems, not > > all, but many of them. It seems pretty great as a foundation. We won't even > > need to make a github

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

I added a repository for Community Discussions, and pinned it at the top. Something like this is good for everyone? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Fri, March 9, 2018 4:32 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: > in an issue in one of the repos in > Qubes-Community-Collaboration ? This. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On 03/09/2018 05:54 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: > The Organization feature of GitHub seems to solve many of our problems, not > all, but many of them. It seems pretty great as a foundation. We won't even > need to make a github list either now, people can just sign up to the > volunteer run GitHub

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

The Organization feature of GitHub seems to solve many of our problems, not all, but many of them. It seems pretty great as a foundation. We won't even need to make a github list either now, people can just sign up to the volunteer run GitHub organization, and we can keep a list of all the

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 4:04:00 PM UTC+1, Ivan Mitev wrote: > On 03/09/2018 04:58 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: > > On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 3:09:31 PM UTC+1, Ivan Mitev wrote: > >> On 03/09/2018 02:53 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: > >>> > >>> Suppose I'll start the first piece of the list to increase the

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On 03/09/2018 04:58 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: > On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 3:09:31 PM UTC+1, Ivan Mitev wrote: >> On 03/09/2018 02:53 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: >>> >>> Suppose I'll start the first piece of the list to increase the individual >>> github awareness. Where that list is later maintained or

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 3:09:31 PM UTC+1, Ivan Mitev wrote: > On 03/09/2018 02:53 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: > > > > Suppose I'll start the first piece of the list to increase the individual > > github awareness. Where that list is later maintained or kept can be > > changed as we discuss that

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 3:09:31 PM UTC+1, Ivan Mitev wrote: > On 03/09/2018 02:53 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: > > > > Suppose I'll start the first piece of the list to increase the individual > > github awareness. Where that list is later maintained or kept can be > > changed as we discuss that

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Fri, March 9, 2018 2:09 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: > Finally, who will create the public wiki + the repo and assign rights ? > You ? awokd ? If the only thing involved is maintaining the list of collaborators, it might be best for one of the Qubes team to do this. That way nobody can go rogue with

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On 03/09/2018 02:53 PM, Yuraeitha wrote: > > Suppose I'll start the first piece of the list to increase the individual > github awareness. Where that list is later maintained or kept can be changed > as we discuss that later. Please add your github if interested, and > copy/paste the list to

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Fri, March 9, 2018 12:53 pm, Yuraeitha wrote: > > Suppose I'll start the first piece of the list to increase the individual > github awareness. Where that list is later maintained or kept can be > changed as we discuss that later. Please add your github if interested, > and copy/paste the list

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Suppose I'll start the first piece of the list to increase the individual github awareness. Where that list is later maintained or kept can be changed as we discuss that later. Please add your github if interested, and copy/paste the list to your own mail response here. Being on this list does

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2018-03-08 00:43, Ivan Mitev wrote: > Andrew: what's your position about mentioning this community effort > somewhere in the official qubes site ? (maybe as a news post with > the proper disclaimer + modifying the "contribute to the docs" >

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On 03/08/2018 06:59 AM, Yuraeitha wrote: > On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 3:15:13 AM UTC+1, Andrew David Wong wrote: > On 2018-03-07 08:48, Yuraeitha wrote: It might be a good idea to have some finished thoughts / discussions ready for Andrew, it'd be inhuman to expect him to read

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 3:15:13 AM UTC+1, Andrew David Wong wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 2018-03-07 08:48, Yuraeitha wrote: > > It might be a good idea to have some finished thoughts / > > discussions ready for Andrew, it'd be inhuman to expect him to

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2018-03-07 08:48, Yuraeitha wrote: > It might be a good idea to have some finished thoughts / > discussions ready for Andrew, it'd be inhuman to expect him to read > everything (it's a lot to read). Thanks. I appreciate that. :) > it might be

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 1:37:06 PM UTC+1, awokd wrote: > On Wed, March 7, 2018 11:48 am, Yuraeitha wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 12:17:09 PM UTC+1, awokd wrote: > > > >> On Wed, March 7, 2018 11:06 am, Yuraeitha wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Let me know if I misunderstood you. I'm

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Wed, March 7, 2018 11:48 am, Yuraeitha wrote: > On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 12:17:09 PM UTC+1, awokd wrote: > >> On Wed, March 7, 2018 11:06 am, Yuraeitha wrote: >> >> >>> Let me know if I misunderstood you. I'm still grasping the proper >>> terminology, as well the limits and possibilities

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 12:17:09 PM UTC+1, awokd wrote: > On Wed, March 7, 2018 11:06 am, Yuraeitha wrote: > > > Let me know if I misunderstood you. I'm still grasping the proper > > terminology, as well the limits and possibilities of Github, so it might > > be easy to misunderstand. > >

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 12:17:09 PM UTC+1, awokd wrote: > On Wed, March 7, 2018 11:06 am, Yuraeitha wrote: > > > Let me know if I misunderstood you. I'm still grasping the proper > > terminology, as well the limits and possibilities of Github, so it might > > be easy to misunderstand. > >

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Wed, March 7, 2018 11:06 am, Yuraeitha wrote: > Let me know if I misunderstood you. I'm still grasping the proper > terminology, as well the limits and possibilities of Github, so it might > be easy to misunderstand. Github is easy for me to misunderstand too. :) You had 2 community repos in

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

@awokd On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 10:45:42 AM UTC+1, awokd wrote: > On Wed, March 7, 2018 9:00 am, Yuraeitha wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:50:13 AM UTC+1, Yuraeitha wrote: > > > >> On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:37:00 AM UTC+1, Yuraeitha wrote: > >> > > >>> > >>> To extend on

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Wed, March 7, 2018 9:00 am, Yuraeitha wrote: > On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:50:13 AM UTC+1, Yuraeitha wrote: > >> On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:37:00 AM UTC+1, Yuraeitha wrote: >> >>> >>> To extend on [799]'s idea of a new Community doc page, and combine >>> the idea to make a stepping

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:50:13 AM UTC+1, Yuraeitha wrote: > On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:37:00 AM UTC+1, Yuraeitha wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 2:28:25 AM UTC+1, Andrew David Wong wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > > On 2018-03-05

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:37:00 AM UTC+1, Yuraeitha wrote: > On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 2:28:25 AM UTC+1, Andrew David Wong wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 2018-03-05 16:28, Alex Dubois wrote: > > >> On 5 Mar 2018, at 21:07, 799

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 2:28:25 AM UTC+1, Andrew David Wong wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 2018-03-05 16:28, Alex Dubois wrote: > >> On 5 Mar 2018, at 21:07, 799 wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > > On Sun, March 4, 2018 8:04 pm, 799

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Sent from my mobile phone. > On 6 Mar 2018, at 01:28, Andrew David Wong wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 2018-03-05 16:28, Alex Dubois wrote: >>> On 5 Mar 2018, at 21:07, 799 wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >> On

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Hey Alex, On 03/06/2018 12:31 AM, Alex Dubois wrote: > > > Sent from my mobile phone. > >> On 5 Mar 2018, at 21:42, awokd wrote: >> >>> On Mon, March 5, 2018 9:07 pm, 799 wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> >> On Sun, March 4, 2018 8:04 pm, 799 wrote: >> >> Can't we

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2018-03-05 16:28, Alex Dubois wrote: >> On 5 Mar 2018, at 21:07, 799 wrote: >> >> Hello, >> > On Sun, March 4, 2018 8:04 pm, 799 wrote: Can't we just > create a new "community" repo where Pull request get >

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Sent from my mobile phone. > On 5 Mar 2018, at 21:42, awokd wrote: > >> On Mon, March 5, 2018 9:07 pm, 799 wrote: >> Hello, >> >> > On Sun, March 4, 2018 8:04 pm, 799 wrote: > > Can't we just create a new "community" repo where Pull request get >

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Sent from my mobile phone. > On 5 Mar 2018, at 21:07, 799 wrote: > > Hello, > >> >> On Sun, March 4, 2018 8:04 pm, 799 wrote: >> >> Can't we just create a new "community" repo where Pull request get >> >> reviewed by us but finally approved by more experienced Power

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Mon, March 5, 2018 9:07 pm, 799 wrote: > Hello, > > >>> On Sun, March 4, 2018 8:04 pm, 799 wrote: >>> Can't we just create a new "community" repo where Pull request get reviewed by us but finally approved by more experienced Power Users >> (this >> group can include Qubes OS

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On 03/04/2018 04:17 PM, 799 wrote: Hello Taiidan, What does "zero qualification" means and what does "advice" stands for? If this is going to be a wiki letting anyone edit it irregardless of skill level will result in poor quality. It's not about advicing (advice to me means: I know

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Hello, >> On Sun, March 4, 2018 8:04 pm, 799 wrote: > >> Can't we just create a new "community" repo where Pull request get > >> reviewed by us but finally approved by more experienced Power Users > (this > >> group can include Qubes OS Team, but also experienced community members > >> selected

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Sent from my mobile phone. > On 5 Mar 2018, at 07:59, 799 wrote: > > Hello Alex, > > 05.03.2018 8:28 "Alex Dubois" wrote: > > I think it is important to keep it as a fork for few reasons: > - most importantly we focus on helping the Qubes team > - if not it would be

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Hello Alex, 05.03.2018 8:28 "Alex Dubois" wrote: I think it is important to keep it as a fork for few reasons: - most importantly we focus on helping the Qubes team - if not it would be hard to clean-up what is in Qubes-doc, in the community repo, and if the Qubes-doc get improved directly, it

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Sent from my mobile phone. > On 4 Mar 2018, at 21:44, awokd wrote: > >> On Sun, March 4, 2018 8:04 pm, 799 wrote: >> >> >> Can't we just create a new "community" repo where Pull request get >> reviewed by us but finally approved by more experienced Power Users (this >>

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Sent from my mobile phone. > On 4 Mar 2018, at 20:04, 799 wrote: > > Hello Alex, > > > 2018-03-04 11:49 GMT+01:00 Alex Dubois : >> >> I had some thought. >> - Qubes team probably don't have the time to spread too thin, and would >> prefer for us to

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

@Taiidan On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 9:48:51 PM UTC+1, tai...@gmx.com wrote: > I will not be participating in any website or wiki of this type if > people with zero qualifications are allowed to provide "advice". > > There are quite a lot of people on this list giving literally dangerous >

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

A forum is a must. It doesnt have to be official. But it needs to happen. It needs to have a section for -Questions & -Community Tutorials at the very least. The Kali forums is a great example of what a qubes forum should look like. -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Sun, March 4, 2018 8:04 pm, 799 wrote: > > Can't we just create a new "community" repo where Pull request get > reviewed by us but finally approved by more experienced Power Users (this > group can include Qubes OS Team, but also experienced community members > selected by the Qubes

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Hello Taiidan, Am 04.03.2018 9:48 nachm. schrieb "taii...@gmx.com" : I will not be participating in any website or wiki of this type if people with zero qualifications are allowed to provide "advice". What does "zero qualification" means and what does "advice" stands for? It's

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

I will not be participating in any website or wiki of this type if people with zero qualifications are allowed to provide "advice". There are quite a lot of people on this list giving literally dangerous advice or telling people not to bother with increasing their security with libre

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Hello Alex, 2018-03-04 11:49 GMT+01:00 Alex Dubois : > > I had some thought. > - Qubes team probably don't have the time to spread too thin, and would > prefer for us to help them on there Qubes repo > - Some people invest time in documenting, but it takes time for Qubes team

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Sunday, 4 March 2018 01:11:08 UTC, Yuraeitha wrote: > On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 2:01:40 AM UTC+1, Yuraeitha wrote: > > @[799] > > Maybe we can do both and increase the overall value altogether? I'll > > understand if you don't think that is a good idea, but lets for a moment > > try see if

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 2:01:40 AM UTC+1, Yuraeitha wrote: > @[799] > Maybe we can do both and increase the overall value altogether? I'll > understand if you don't think that is a good idea, but lets for a moment try > see if a merged forum/github-wiki concept can work. We could make a

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

@[799] Maybe we can do both and increase the overall value altogether? I'll understand if you don't think that is a good idea, but lets for a moment try see if a merged forum/github-wiki concept can work. We could make a sub-forum or even a whole forum section for GitHub account activity. Make

AW: Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Hello yuraeitha, Original-Nachricht An 2. März 2018, 22:05, Yuraeitha schrieb: > Thoughts about using a forum? Possibly with > a frontpage blog? If we indeed go with > something like this, forum or some other > platform, as you also questioned Ivan I don't know what the right

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2018-03-02 23:16, Andrew David Wong wrote: > On 2018-03-02 15:05, Yuraeitha wrote: >> Some of the issues/questions addressed seems like they could be >> solved quite effectively and efficiently on a highly >> customize-able forum? > >> [...] >

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2018-03-02 15:05, Yuraeitha wrote: > Some of the issues/questions addressed seems like they could be > solved quite effectively and efficiently on a highly > customize-able forum? > > [...] > > Thoughts about using a forum? > FYI, in case

Re: AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Those are interesting points [799] & Ivan, I agree with both of your views. I also like the concept of moving guides/scripts over to the official Qubes doc's for final review if it reaches a certain minimum of quality. Keeping it separate in some sense to differentiate quality, seems like a

AW: Re: [qubes-users] For community by community - A way to preserve/focus everyones work going into Qubes, bottom-up

Hello, Original-Nachricht An 2. März 2018, 04:10, Yuraeitha schrieb: > It would be interesting to hear if the Qubes > staff think this is a bad or good idea though, > or if they're neutral about it. At least I'm not > planning to keep going with this if they think > it's a bad