On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:34:30AM +0800, Sandy Harris wrote:
> Can the OS be booted from the network?
short answer: no.
> Can I avoid the problem by booting Qubes-OS from the network?
what problem?
"i dont trust the vendor bios"?
how would running an even more complex untrusted bios solve the
> "sudo dd if=Qubes-R3-x86_64.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1048576 && sync"
> Both produced exactly the same results, which is to install just fine, but
> then fail when rebooting/initial configuring.
Is this the exact command you are using? If so, why exactly are you
using Qubes R3? 4.0 is the current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2020-04-25 03:00, Guerlan wrote:
> I started having constant firefox crashes on my debian9 Qube. I
> sent the crash reports to firefox and the said that the problem
> occurs because of the shared memory configuration of Qubes, but he
> don't know
Hi there
I'm relatively new to the Qubes unique environment and I'm trying to get my
head around possible use of Qubes in small/medium enterprise environments,
where the system is maintained by an admin and the user freedom is limited by
the company policies. I understand that the current
I am running fedora-30 in an App-VM (not disposable) and I also
experience the crashes. Not only Firefox, Opera also crashes, while
Slack app and Thunderbird which also run all the time don't. I
thought this is because of not enough RAM - but out of frustration I
assigned 23GB to that machine and
if someone ever reed this:
My Problenmm: Brigtness locked.
What does it mean, what you write about BIOS ?
Resp: If it is set to max - in the BIOS:
Does that mean, that i can't change it with F1 and F2 ???
Because, it's set to max in the BIOS?
If so, than i have a problem - BIOS
Hello all,
Various application lament lack of disk space in a particular qube, but
measuring it gives very different results.
1 Qubes manager tells that Disk Usage is 4973 MB
2 Setting tells that Private Storage Max size is 18524 MB
3 Baobab tells 2.1 GB available and 12.4 GB total
4 Nautilus
Do you think QUBES is better than COPPERHEAD or does COPPERHEAD have better
features than QUBES?
It would be great if you opened up QUBES for worldwide editing and audit and
development. Or maybe merge with PARROT or TAILS or OPENBSD or WHONIX to
further friendly usability for all people
No, I did edit commands to R4.0.3 when I used them
On Monday, April 27, 2020 at 9:13:57 PM UTC+12, Jarrah wrote:
>
>
> > "sudo dd if=Qubes-R3-x86_64.iso of=/dev/sdX bs=1048576 && sync"
> > Both produced exactly the same results, which is to install just fine,
> but then fail when
Oops. Sent to poster rather than list.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Sandy Harris
Date: Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [qubes-users] QUBES Friendly Version
To: [NOTIFICATION]
'[NOTIFICATION]' via qubes-users wrote:
> Do you think QUBES is better than COPPERHEAD or
10 matches
Mail list logo
