[qubes-users] Re: ANN: Leakproof Qubes VPN

2016-10-14 Thread epicdonk
Hello, what is the difference between this implementation and just following the VPN guide on the Qubes website? Both seem to create a proxyVM. https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/vpn/ Is your version more leak proof, if so, how? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

[qubes-users] View: Qubes discussion should be migrated away from Google Groups

2016-10-14 Thread epicdonk
I imagine the requirement of a Google account deters many from contributing to discussion. All Google accounts require SMS verification of a phone, which is very de-anonymizing, and sort of out of line with the privacy centric nature of Qubes and its users. -- You received this message becaus

[qubes-users] What do you think about the idea of a FileVM?

2016-07-28 Thread epicdonk
A fileVM would be a mountable filesystem that 2 or more AppVMs can share. A fileVM could be a normal partition like MSDOS/FAT32, an encrypted filesystem, or even a distributed or cloud filesystem. There are numerous uses for this, for example, installing Dropbox on a Linux AppVM and sharing the

[qubes-users] Re: What do you think about the idea of a FileVM?

2016-07-29 Thread epicdonk
On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 2:36:57 AM UTC-6, grzegorz@gmail.com wrote: > W dniu piątek, 29 lipca 2016 03:42:07 UTC+2 użytkownik epic...@gmail.com > napisał: > > A fileVM would be a mountable filesystem that 2 or more AppVMs can share. > > > > A fileVM could be a normal partition like MSDOS/F

Re: [qubes-users] What do you think about the idea of a FileVM?

2016-07-29 Thread epicdonk
> If there's such a great need to be constantly transferring files back and > forth between two or more domains, then that suggests that they shouldn't > actually be separate security domains in the first place, doesn't it? > Yes 100% agree / valid logic. > An exception to this would be VMs that