Le dimanche 25 juin 2017 08:09:04 UTC-4, tai...@gmx.com a écrit :
> On 06/24/2017 08:16 PM, Johnysecured88 wrote:
>
> > Are you a developer?
> No.
> > Can we get input from a developer on this issue?
> You should email the community liaison, as it is definitely a question
> worth asking.
>
On 06/24/2017 08:16 PM, Johnysecured88 wrote:
Are you a developer?
No.
Can we get input from a developer on this issue?
You should email the community liaison, as it is definitely a question
worth asking.
a...@qubes-os.org
If you want a supported build done by them you would probably have
Are you a developer? Can we get input from a developer on this issue?
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [qubes-users] power9 and qubes os
> Local Time: June 24, 2017 7:11 PM
> UTC Time: June 25, 2017 12:
://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [qubes-users] power9 and qubes os
Local Time: June 23, 2017 11:10 PM
UTC Time: June 24, 2017 4:10 AM
From: taii...@gmx.com
To: Johnysecured88 <johnysecure...@protonmail.com>, qubes-users@googlegroups.com
<qu
I understand compiling for another arch is not difficult, but are there not any
special requirements from Qubes/Xen which are ISA based?
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [qubes-users] power9 and qubes os
&
On 06/23/2017 08:24 PM, 'Johnysecured88' via qubes-users wrote:
Seriously, is power9 support at least a possibility for qubes os? It seems
absurd that we should only focus on x86 given how locked down and backdoored it
is.
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
If you
Seriously, is power9 support at least a possibility for qubes os? It seems
absurd that we should only focus on x86 given how locked down and backdoored it
is.
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
