Oops. Sent to poster rather than list. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Sandy Harris <sandyinch...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:41 AM Subject: Re: [qubes-users] QUBES Friendly Version To: [NOTIFICATION] <agent1...@protonmail.ch>
'[NOTIFICATION]' via qubes-users <qubes-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Do you think QUBES is better than COPPERHEAD or does COPPERHEAD have better > features than QUBES? This is a remarkably stupid question, since their purposes & environments are quite different. Copperhead aims at securing Android phones, Qubes at enabling more secure us of workstation or laptop computers. Many users might need both. Also "better features" is a poor metric for comparing security products. Yes, there are necessary features but the main concern should be solid design & one way to achieve that is to avoid adding unnecessary features. > It would be great if you opened up QUBES for worldwide editing and audit and > development. Or maybe merge with PARROT or TAILS or OPENBSD or WHONIX to > further friendly usability for all people instead of making it so complex for > hardcore users without compromising its robust secure foundation? Qubes supports Whonix VMs & you might be able to run a BSD, Parrot or Tails in a VM. Personally, I consider systemd both a mistake & a security hazard, so I'd like Qubes to use Devuan in Dom0 & support Devuan VMs. > Express Actual Notice: ... All Rights Reserved. Special Deposit. Get your f'ing lawyers off my computer! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/CACXcFmkz63CRtssW-xLMvYu06a9Lkz57SWKWfUfkhi6UFLOAjA%40mail.gmail.com.
