Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools 3.2.2-3 released

2016-10-27 Thread Drew White
On Thursday, 27 October 2016 03:21:09 UTC+11, Robert Mittendorf wrote: > After updating Qubes tool, basically all relavant devices have issues. > > Qubes Video, Xen Interface, Xen PV Storage, Xen PV Network. There has been an issue with QWT for as long as I can remember. the Qubes Video driver

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools 3.2.2-3 released

2016-10-26 Thread Robert Mittendorf
After updating Qubes tool, basically all relavant devices have issues. Qubes Video, Xen Interface, Xen PV Storage, Xen PV Network. Config in registry incomplete or broken (Code 19) The repair option of the QWT uninstaller does not solve the issue as well. Any idea? Otherwise I think I'm stuck

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-10-03 Thread Dave Ewart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sunday, 02.10.2016 at 06:10 -0700, Drew White wrote: > > [...] > > > > You see the difference? Your follow-up reply was inappropriate. It > > didn't actually explain what you wanted, it didn't help them to help > > you, and it led to this

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-10-02 Thread Drew White
On Friday, 30 September 2016 18:34:29 UTC+10, Dave Ewart wrote: > As I said previously, the version of Windows is not usually discussed > (since it just depends on which updates have been installed) and you > would have got a better answer the first time if you'd included - for > example - "My

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-30 Thread Achim Patzner
Am 30.09.2016 um 03:20 schrieb Drew White: > On Thursday, 29 September 2016 19:40:12 UTC+10, Achim Patzner wrote: >> No, you -- being a non-paying end-user; I've yet to see any worthwhile >> contribution from you -- _demanded_ (in a quite untoward manner an >> explanation from a "developer".

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-30 Thread Dave Ewart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thursday, 29.09.2016 at 18:01 -0700, Drew White wrote: > On Thursday, 29 September 2016 17:41:23 UTC+10, Dave Ewart wrote: > > There is no commonly-accepted definition of 'version' with regard to > > Windows, only "64-bit v 32-bit" and the

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-29 Thread Drew White
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 19:40:12 UTC+10, Achim Patzner wrote: > > On Thursday, 29 September 2016 04:05:41 UTC+10, Achim Patzner wrote: > >> Which part of "we don't provide signed drivers so if you want to run > >> them you have to turn that requirement off" needs a developer to make > >>

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-29 Thread Drew White
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 15:03:45 UTC+10, entr0py wrote: > It gives me no pleasure (well...) to gang up on a guy who obviously doesn't > have the slightest notion of what it means to possess even a modicum of > social grace. But in the absence of a downvote button, how else do you voice

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-29 Thread Achim Patzner
Am 29.09.2016 um 09:41 schrieb Dave Ewart: > If you have some unusual definition of 'version' then you should explain > what that definition is. Shouting at people - expecting them to > understand you - won't help. Didn't someone read you some classics when you were a child? Carrol, Lewis,

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-29 Thread Achim Patzner
Am 29.09.2016 um 03:16 schrieb Drew White: > On Thursday, 29 September 2016 04:05:41 UTC+10, Achim Patzner wrote: >> Which part of "we don't provide signed drivers so if you want to run >> them you have to turn that requirement off" needs a developer to make >> you understand it and what kind of

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-29 Thread Jeremy Rand
entr0py: > > You're too modest. You make people's heads explode with your mastery of > complex subjects - for fun! Well, my head did kind of explode from reading those highly entertaining highlights, but I think your explanation only is valid if "mastery" is a signed variable. > Just including

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-29 Thread Dave Ewart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Wednesday, 28.09.2016 at 17:53 -0700, Drew White wrote: > > > > > I would like to know from a dev what the requirements are for > > > > > Qubes Windows Tools (QWT). > > > > > > > > > > All O/S reference are known to be x86_64. > > > > > > > >

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-28 Thread entr0py
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 It gives me no pleasure (well...) to gang up on a guy who obviously doesn't have the slightest notion of what it means to possess even a modicum of social grace. But in the absence of a downvote button, how else do you voice your disapproval of a

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-28 Thread Drew White
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 06:08:12 UTC+10, Jeremy Rand wrote: > Achim Patzner: > > Am 28.09.2016 um 10:06 schrieb Drew White: > >> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote: > Why

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-28 Thread Drew White
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 04:05:41 UTC+10, Achim Patzner wrote: > Am 28.09.2016 um 10:06 schrieb Drew White: > > On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote: > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote: > >>> Why does QWT require

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-28 Thread Drew White
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 18:33:25 UTC+10, Dave Ewart wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Wednesday, 28.09.2016 at 01:06 -0700, Drew White wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 28,

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-28 Thread Jeremy Rand
Achim Patzner: > Am 28.09.2016 um 10:06 schrieb Drew White: >> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote: >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote: Why does QWT require TESTSIGNING to be turned on? Is that because Win7

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-28 Thread Achim Patzner
Am 28.09.2016 um 10:06 schrieb Drew White: > On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote: >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White wrote: >>> Why does QWT require TESTSIGNING to be turned on? >>> Is that because Win7 requires things to be

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Windows Tools

2016-09-28 Thread Dave Ewart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Wednesday, 28.09.2016 at 01:06 -0700, Drew White wrote: > On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:47:01 UTC+10, Foppe de Haan wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 8:20:29 AM UTC+2, Drew White > > wrote: > > > Hi Devs, > > > > > > I would