Re: [ntp:questions] ntpq -crv gives results in local time, not UTC

2012-04-06 Thread Gom
I agree that my solution is fraught with cost and can imagine others reaching different decisions. I would much prefer if Windows were clever enough to use the UTC offset in effect at the given time when converting between UTC and local -- instead, it always uses the current UTC offset

[ntp:questions] Missing peer bug in 4.2.7p270

2012-04-06 Thread A C
There's an intermittent bug in 4.2.7p270 that seems to drop the last Internet peer during startup. Note this bug exists in the unmodified source code so it's nothing to do with any of the tinkering I've done. I have two refclocks and five Internet hosts configured for a total of seven peers.

Re: [ntp:questions] Missing peer bug in 4.2.7p270

2012-04-06 Thread A C
On 4/6/2012 19:59, Dave Hart wrote: On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 23:09, A Cagcarver+...@acarver.net wrote: There's an intermittent bug in 4.2.7p270 that seems to drop the last Internet peer during startup. Note this bug exists in the unmodified source code so it's nothing to do with any of the

Re: [ntp:questions] Missing peer bug in 4.2.7p270

2012-04-06 Thread Dave Hart
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 03:33, A C agcarver+...@acarver.net wrote: No error messages for DNS in the logs (grep for DNS, giving, host, lookup, resolve).  It would appear DNS worked but the peer simply vanished sometime during startup. Is there a pruning process that occurs if two identical IPs