Re: [ntp:questions] client behind NAT (low-port bug)

2012-04-16 Thread E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Jason Lixfeld wrote: > The main issue here is that the NAT box ahead of my > internal NTP server changes the source port of the > output NTP request to some low port < 123, > which ntpd seems to reject. > Modifying the configuration on my NAT box may be an option as well. If you believe in RFCs

Re: [ntp:questions] client behind NAT (low-port bug)

2012-04-16 Thread Dave Hart
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 13:08, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > Hi, > > Per > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/msg/5a0f45eaecc06578 > I checked ntp_proto.c and found that in the latest 4.2.7, the same issue > seems to persist as what David was suggesting was the underlying issue. > >  

Re: [ntp:questions] client behind NAT (low-port bug)

2012-04-16 Thread Rob
Jason Lixfeld wrote: > To circle back around, the main issue here is that the NAT box ahead of my > internal NTP server changes the source port of the output NTP request to some > low port < 123, which ntpd seems to reject. Modifying the configuration on > my NAT box may be an option as well.

[ntp:questions] client behind NAT (low-port bug)

2012-04-16 Thread Jason Lixfeld
Hi, Per http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/msg/5a0f45eaecc06578 I checked ntp_proto.c and found that in the latest 4.2.7, the same issue seems to persist as what David was suggesting was the underlying issue. /* * Monitor the packet and get restrictions. Not