David J Taylor wrote:
A small box like that would make a nice NTP server if it can be done.
The only (very small) contribution I can make is that for some time I
ran NTP with GPS on a Pentium 133 MHz with 48 MB of memory using
FreeBSD, so you CPU-grunt is at least adequate. Rebuilding the kernel
Hi Dave,
I cannot speak to using the PI specifically. I have been experimenting with GPS
+ NTP quite a bit and now have a cross platform, Windows and Linux, stratum 1
(non public) time server running on my LAN. Depending on your requirements, you
may not need PPS through the UART. I have succes
Hi Dave,
I can't speak to using the PI specifically. However, I have been experimenting
with NTP + GPS a good bit, and now have a cross platform, Windows and Linux,
(non public) stratum 1 server running on my LAN. Depending on your
requirements, you may not need PPS through the UART. I have suc
On Wed, 30 May 2012 14:15:27 +0100, David J Taylor wrote:
>
> [Although the two jitters of 180 milliseconds in your ntpq -p billboard is
> not encouraging!]
>
>
According to http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs
"The Ethernet is driven via USB 2.0, so the upstream bandwidth would not
support Gigabit."
T
I have received the following notice:
__
NOTIFICATION OF GPS JAMMING EXERCISES RAF SPADEADAM, CUMBRIA, SEPTEMBER
2012
Dates: Between the 10th of Sept to the 14th of Sept 2012 inclusive.
Times: 0700 -2000 GMT.
Location of MULTIPLE jammers: Land based
Hi.
From the title, you might (maybe) guess this is about the Raspberry Pi,
and NTP.
I've only had the thing a few days, but been experimenting (playing)
with the default NTP behaviour as seen with ntpq -p on the command line.
[]
It's said, that the RasPi, has about the same cpu "grunt" as a 3
Hi.
>From the title, you might (maybe) guess this is about the Raspberry Pi,
and NTP.
I've only had the thing a few days, but been experimenting (playing)
with the default NTP behaviour as seen with ntpq -p on the command line.
The Fedora remix distro' is a bit of a disaster, unless I've scre
