Hi ,
Basically my intention is to get notification in client when ever the
connection between server changes(Ex-lan connectivity OR ntp server itself is
down).For that I am doing the following step:
In client:
1.Execute ntpq -c associations
2.Get the data in status field
3.If there is any
On 7/31/2013 00:26, Biswajit Panigrahi wrote:
Hi ,
Basically my intention is to get notification in client when ever the
connection between server changes(Ex-lan connectivity OR ntp server itself is
down).For that I am doing the following step:
In client:
1.Execute ntpq -c associations
2.Get
Does anyone know from where this NTPD error comes from?
Event Viewer output:
System
-
Provider
[ Name]
NTP
-
EventID
1
Level
2
If he is using broadcast mode, what earthly difference does it make how
often he
broadcasts? After 10:02:25:57 of uptime, on my time server NTPD has only
used
00:04:25 of CPU time. A broadcast takes NTPD literally less than a
microsecond,
and less than a millisecond to reach the clients.
It
On 2013-07-30, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
Dave Baxter wrote:
In reference to my other thread.
THunderbolt monitor/control on Win7 ?
Well, as that device seems happy in it's potential new home.
I've been poking
On 2013-07-31, Biswajit Panigrahi bp00106...@techmahindra.com wrote:
Hi ,
Basically my intention is to get notification in client when ever the
connection between server changes(Ex-lan connectivity OR ntp server itself is
down).For that I am doing the following step:
ntp is NOT the way to
On 2013-07-31, Thomas Laus lau...@acm.org wrote:
On 2013-07-30, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
Dave Baxter wrote:
In reference to my other thread.
THunderbolt monitor/control on Win7 ?
Well, as that device seems
On 2013-07-31, Charles Elliott elliott...@verizon.net wrote:
If he is using broadcast mode, what earthly difference does it make how
often he
broadcasts? After 10:02:25:57 of uptime, on my time server NTPD has only
used
00:04:25 of CPU time. A broadcast takes NTPD literally less than a
On Jul 31, 2013, at 6:01 AM, Charles Elliott elliott...@verizon.net wrote:
If he is using broadcast mode, what earthly difference does it make how
often he broadcasts?
If you have a small # of machines per collision domain, then broadcasting
frequently probably won't matter. If you've got
On 2013-07-31, Thomas Laus lau...@acm.org wrote:
The pulse width wasn't adjustable. It was was just on the ragged edge
of what the Soekris UART DCD was able to see for pps kernel
discipline. It occasonally missed a pulse and that caused some
problems for ntp because it had the time solution
On 2013-07-31, unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
Years ago when I used a Thunderbolt to provide a local time reference
on a Soekris system I found that the PPS pulse was a little too narrow
to trigger the Soekris UART. I had to use one of these:
http://www.tapr.org/kits_fatpps.html
And in all
Charles Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
If you have a small # of machines per collision domain, then
broadcasting frequently probably won't matter. If you've got
thousands or tens of thousands of machines to deal with, and need to
pay attention to the MAC table sizes of your various switches
On 2013-07-31, Thomas Laus lau...@acm.org wrote:
On 2013-07-31, Thomas Laus lau...@acm.org wrote:
The pulse width wasn't adjustable. It was was just on the ragged edge
of what the Soekris UART DCD was able to see for pps kernel
discipline. It occasonally missed a pulse and that caused some
On Jul 31, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Rick Jones rick.jon...@hp.com wrote:
Charles Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
If you have a small # of machines per collision domain, then
broadcasting frequently probably won't matter. If you've got
thousands or tens of thousands of machines to deal with, and need
Biswajit Panigrahi wrote:
notification when server changes, suggest other approach.
ntpq -c rv 3 reach
--
E-Mail Sent to this address blackl...@anitech-systems.com
will be added to the BlackLists.
___
questions mailing list
In article dajlca-267@ns2.lordynet.org.uk, sn...@lordynet.org
says...
unruh wrote:
On 2013-07-30, David Lord sn...@lordynet.org wrote:
Dave Baxter wrote:
Hi again.
In reference to my other thread.
THunderbolt monitor/control on Win7 ?
Well, as that device seems happy in
In article XCcKt.293983$0a4.200...@fx06.iad, un...@invalid.ca says...
On 2013-07-31, Thomas Laus lau...@acm.org wrote:
On 2013-07-31, Thomas Laus lau...@acm.org wrote:
The pulse width wasn't adjustable. It was was just on the ragged edge
of what the Soekris UART DCD was able to see for
Charles Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Jul 31, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Rick Jones rick.jon...@hp.com wrote:
Issues of filling the forwarding (what I think you are calling the
MAC) table on a switch is a matter of how many unique source MAC
addresses the switch sees, not how many broadcasts a
18 matches
Mail list logo
