William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-01-09, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem?
Hello William,
1. The installer is branded:
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/setup.html
I still have no idea what you are
Assuming it's something like 4.2.8p1-beta5:
4.2.8P1BetaN are newer than 4.2.8 but they're not release candidates like
4.2.8.pN-RCm will be.
You can see the 4.2 releases here: http://archive.ntp.org/ntp4/ntp-4.2/.
Thanks Paul for the explanation. Now it is clear. RCm is pre, betaM is
On 09/01/15 15:58, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for compiled NTP 4.2.8 for Windows. I know Meinberg's version but
unfortunately it is branded.
Does anybody know such binary package?
I want to avoid compiling it by myself if I can.
best regards
Johny
Johny,
What
Jan,
I'm just replying to your post because it the most recent one in this
thread.
Jan Ceuleers wrote:
On 09/01/15 15:58, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for compiled NTP 4.2.8 for Windows. I know Meinberg's version but
unfortunately it is branded.
Does anybody know such
On 10/01/2015 15:08, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote:
[]
Where can I find changelog for the p1 and betas?
I can't find it here:
http://archive.ntp.org/ntp4/ntp-4.2/NEWS
best regards
Johny
http://archive.ntp.org/ntp4/ChangeLog-stable-rc
--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
On 09/01/2015 23:55, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem?
Hello William,
1. The installer is branded:
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/setup.html
2. The installer makes a lot of things. I need pure final and stable ntp.
best regards
Johny
On 1/10/2015 10:08 AM, trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote:
Assuming it's something like 4.2.8p1-beta5:
4.2.8P1BetaN are newer than 4.2.8 but they're not release candidates like
4.2.8.pN-RCm will be.
You can see the 4.2 releases here: http://archive.ntp.org/ntp4/ntp-4.2/.
Thanks Paul for the
On 2015-01-10, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-01-09, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem?
Hello William,
1. The installer is branded: