On 2017-12-12, romain.cordonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> Many thanks for your information.
>
> My project is processing meteorological data.
>
> I will check the fake ntp server python code.
>
> Restarting the ntpd is enough to synchronize with upper source ? even
romain.cordonn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have the same need as Cristian.
I am working on a data processing project which is designed to run
for 25 years.
The customer wants us to run data processing simulation at any time
(past/present/future) from 2018 to 2043.
Is to possible to
> Le 5 déc. 2017 à 18:04, William Unruh a écrit :
>
> On 2017-12-05, romain.cordonn...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have the same need as Cristian.
>>
>> I am working on a data processing project which is designed to run for 25
>>
On 2017-12-05, romain.cordonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have the same need as Cristian.
>
> I am working on a data processing project which is designed to run for 25
> years.
>
> The customer wants us to run data processing simulation at any time
>
Thank you for good solution suggestions and thanks for you who explained
on behalf of me different scenarios where fake time is justified.
The fake time is used for internal simulation purposes only, it will not
be used for any malicious use.
--
Cristian Seres
On 2011-05-02, Cristian Seres cristia...@contrasec.fi wrote:
Thank you for good solution suggestions and thanks for you who explained
on behalf of me different scenarios where fake time is justified.
The fake time is used for internal simulation purposes only, it will not
be used for any
In article slrnirobu0.8be.un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca,
unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
On 2011-04-30, Joseph Gwinn joegw...@comcast.net wrote:
In article slrnirllcv.g22.un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca,
unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
On 2011-04-29, Cristian Seres
On 2011-04-30, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM, unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Can you not just shut off ntp and set the clock back or forward? Ie, do
you care in that case if he clock tracks UTC or not?
Point is not to be on exact
On 2011-04-30, Richard B. Gilbert rgilber...@comcast.net wrote:
On 4/29/2011 10:39 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM, unruhun...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Can you not just shut off ntp and set the clock back or forward? Ie, do
you care in that case if he clock
unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote in message
news:slrnirnckd.qft.un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca...
[]
I still have no idea why the OP wants to do what he claims to want to
do.
Perhaps you remember how year 2000 rollover tests were carried out? It
included setting the clock forward
unruh wrote:
On 2011-04-30, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM, unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Can you not just shut off ntp and set the clock back or forward? Ie, do
you care in that case if he clock tracks UTC or not?
Point is
In article slrnirllcv.g22.un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca,
unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
On 2011-04-29, Cristian Seres cristia...@contrasec.fi wrote:
Hi!
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately in past/future, say 365*86400
On 2011-04-30, Joseph Gwinn joegw...@comcast.net wrote:
In article slrnirllcv.g22.un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca,
unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
On 2011-04-29, Cristian Seres cristia...@contrasec.fi wrote:
Hi!
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately in past/future, say 365*86400 seconds, or even better -
first set the freely chosen date on NTP server and then keep the hours,
minutes and seconds in sync with the real time?
On 4/30/2011 6:07 PM, folkert wrote:
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately in past/future, say 365*86400 seconds, or even better -
first set the freely chosen date on NTP server and then keep the hours,
minutes and seconds in sync with the real
On 2011-04-30, folkert folk...@vanheusden.com wrote:
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately in past/future, say 365*86400 seconds, or even better -
first set the freely chosen date on NTP server and then keep the hours,
minutes and seconds
Hi!
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately in past/future, say 365*86400 seconds, or even better -
first set the freely chosen date on NTP server and then keep the hours,
minutes and seconds in sync with the real time?
Many thanks,
--
On 2011-04-29, Cristian Seres cristia...@contrasec.fi wrote:
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately in past/future, say 365*86400 seconds, or even better -
first set the freely chosen date on NTP server and then keep the hours,
minutes and
On 2011-04-29, Cristian Seres cristia...@contrasec.fi wrote:
Hi!
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately in past/future, say 365*86400 seconds, or even better -
first set the freely chosen date on NTP server and then keep the hours,
minutes
Cristian Seres wrote:
Hi!
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately in past/future, say 365*86400 seconds, or even better -
first set the freely chosen date on NTP server and then keep the hours,
minutes and seconds in sync with the real time?
Get
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:13 AM, unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
On 2011-04-29, Cristian Seres cristia...@contrasec.fi wrote:
Hi!
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately in past/future, say 365*86400 seconds, or even better -
first
On 2011-04-29, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:13 AM, unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
On 2011-04-29, Cristian Seres cristia...@contrasec.fi wrote:
Hi!
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM, unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Can you not just shut off ntp and set the clock back or forward? Ie, do
you care in that case if he clock tracks UTC or not?
Point is not to be on exact UTC but still to keep a set of computer's
clocks all on the same
On 4/29/2011 7:24 AM, Cristian Seres wrote:
Hi!
How would you implement an NTP server which would need to offer a time
set deliberately in past/future, say 365*86400 seconds, or even better -
first set the freely chosen date on NTP server and then keep the hours,
minutes and seconds in sync
On 4/29/2011 10:39 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:02 PM, unruhun...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Can you not just shut off ntp and set the clock back or forward? Ie, do
you care in that case if he clock tracks UTC or not?
Point is not to be on exact UTC but still to
25 matches
Mail list logo