On 2013-09-04, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
unruh wrote: IF you know you fixed that bug in the new version,
then by allmeans tell the complainant to reinstall.
But if you do not know that that bug is fixed,
then
Magnus Danielson wrote:
On 09/02/2013 02:33 PM, David Lord wrote:
Harlan Stenn wrote:
David Lord writes:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
server ntp1.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp3.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp1.sp.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.sp.se
On 2013-09-03, David Lord sn...@lordynet.org wrote:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
On 09/02/2013 02:33 PM, David Lord wrote:
Harlan Stenn wrote:
David Lord writes:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
server ntp1.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp3.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
David Lord writes:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
server ntp1.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp3.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp1.sp.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.sp.se iburst maxpoll 7
that seems too restrictive and possibly abusive if you do
Harlan Stenn wrote:
David Lord writes:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
server ntp1.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp3.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp1.sp.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.sp.se iburst maxpoll 7
that seems too restrictive and possibly abusive if
Hi,
On 09/02/2013 12:39 AM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
unruh writes:
In this case ntpd wandered off by hours with no complaint. That is not a
proper behaviour of a professional piece of software.
And I don't remember the config file. If the target platform has a
config file with setting that
On 09/02/2013 02:33 PM, David Lord wrote:
Harlan Stenn wrote:
David Lord writes:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
server ntp1.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp3.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp1.sp.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.sp.se iburst maxpoll 7
that
On 09/02/2013 03:49 AM, unruh wrote:
On 2013-09-01, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
server ntp1.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp3.kth.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp1.sp.se iburst maxpoll 7
server ntp2.sp.se iburst maxpoll 7
# Access
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:n5lUt.340835$qt4.176...@fx22.iad...
On 2013-08-31, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
[...]
perhaps it has already been fixed in a more recent version.
Sorry, but I have
Maarten Wiltink maar...@kittensandcats.net wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:n5lUt.340835$qt4.176...@fx22.iad...
On 2013-08-31, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
[...]
perhaps it has already been
On 9/1/2013 7:10 AM, Rob wrote:
Maarten Wiltink maar...@kittensandcats.net wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:n5lUt.340835$qt4.176...@fx22.iad...
On 2013-08-31, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
[...]
On 2013-09-01, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Maarten Wiltink maar...@kittensandcats.net wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-08-31, BlackLists wrote:
perhaps it has already been fixed in a more recent version.
[snip]
Sorry, but I have always found this to be a complete copout.
Rob nom...@example.com wrote in message
news:slrnl2684g.6em.nom...@xs8.xs4all.nl...
[...]
Like unruh, I hate developers and companies with this attitude.
Well, thanks, I'll keep that in mind. For the record, I have no
particular dislike for you.
When there is no reason to believe that a
On 2013-09-01, Maarten Wiltink maar...@kittensandcats.net wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:n5lUt.340835$qt4.176...@fx22.iad...
On 2013-08-31, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
[...]
perhaps it has
On 2013-09-01, Steve Kostecke koste...@ntp.org wrote:
On 2013-09-01, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
The NTP Reference Implementation is free software. The copyright
holder (The University of Delaware) makes no representations
about the suitability this software for any purpose. It is
provided
On 09/01/2013 10:42 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2013-09-01, Steve Kostecke koste...@ntp.org wrote:
On 2013-09-01, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
The NTP Reference Implementation is free software. The copyright
holder (The University of Delaware) makes no representations
about the suitability this
unruh writes:
In this case ntpd wandered off by hours with no complaint. That is not a
proper behaviour of a professional piece of software.
And I don't remember the config file. If the target platform has a
config file with setting that change the performance so the described
behavior is
Magnus Danielson wrote:
On 09/01/2013 10:42 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2013-09-01, Steve Kostecke koste...@ntp.org wrote:
On 2013-09-01, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
The NTP Reference Implementation is free software. The copyright
holder (The University of Delaware) makes no representations
about
On 2013-09-01, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
On 09/01/2013 10:42 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2013-09-01, Steve Kostecke koste...@ntp.org wrote:
On 2013-09-01, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
The NTP Reference Implementation is free software. The copyright
holder (The University of
On 2013-09-01, Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
unruh writes:
In this case ntpd wandered off by hours with no complaint. That is not a
proper behaviour of a professional piece of software.
And I don't remember the config file. If the target platform has a
config file with setting that
On 2013-08-31, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
Magnus Danielson wrote: BlackLists wrote:
What ntpdc commands did you issue, and what results did you get?
Unfortunatly no. I got the call after the fact,
but lack of
In article kvre7q$j89$1...@dont-email.me, E-Mail Sent to this address
will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
Magnus Danielson wrote: BlackLists wrote:
What ntpdc commands did you issue, and what results did you get?
Unfortunatly no. I got the call
On 08/30/2013 04:17 AM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
BlackLists wrote:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
We had another incident where a node configured with multiple NTP
sources had an NTPD which when asked with ntpdc have peers, looks like
things are all OK, but with offsets less
On 2013-08-30, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
On 08/30/2013 04:17 AM, BlackLists wrote:
Have you tried a newer version of NTP ?
http://www.ntp.org/downloads.html
[snip]
No, I listed the affected version as packaged by Debian.
We have an autobuilder which packages the
Magnus Danielson wrote: BlackLists wrote:
What ntpdc commands did you issue, and what results did you get?
Unfortunatly no. I got the call after the fact,
but lack of remote login due to time error would prohibit
me from doing anything anyway.
The server needed to be operational rather
Hi,
We had another incident where a node configured with multiple NTP
sources had an NTPD which when asked with ntpdc have peers, looks like
things are all OK, but with offsets less than a second, while the node
in fact was 6 days off the mark. Only on a number of ntpdc querries did
some of the
Magnus Danielson wrote:
We had another incident where a node configured with multiple NTP
sources had an NTPD which when asked with ntpdc have peers, looks like
things are all OK, but with offsets less than a second, while the node
in fact was 6 days off the mark. Only on a number of ntpdc
27 matches
Mail list logo
