On 11/11/2013 00:26, Steve Kostecke wrote:
[]
An article from Charles made it to the Google Groups mirror of c.p.t.n:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.protocols.time.ntp/VLNotnd_nms/vBCbcxQkp3MJ
Looks like a problem with your free news server.
Thanks, Steve, good to know at
On 2013-11-09, David J Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Charles Elliott wrote:
The result of reading the timestamp counter can vary wildly due to
EIST (speed step technology), turbo modes, and owner overclocking, in
addition to differences in CPUs, as noted. There is quite a bit
From: Charles Elliott
Cc: questions@lists.ntp.org
The result of reading the timestamp counter can vary wildly due to EIST
(speed step technology), turbo modes, and owner overclocking, in addition to
differences in CPUs, as noted. There is quite a bit about this on the
Internet. As I recall,
