I while ago I discussed the problem with an ntpd server that has to
be synchronized to a GPSDO that provides PPS but no absolute time.
After the usual discussion about you should not want that, a solution
was finally found using the following tricky workaround:
# PPS via ATOM
server 127.127.22.0
On 2014-07-29, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
I while ago I discussed the problem with an ntpd server that has to
be synchronized to a GPSDO that provides PPS but no absolute time.
After the usual discussion about you should not want that, a solution
was finally found using the following
On 2014-07-29 11:33, William Unruh wrote:
On 2014-07-29, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
The reasoning is that once the time is locked to PPS, it should remain
close enough for the local clock to be trusted as an absolute time
source (this system is rarely rebooted).
It should do that even
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2014-07-29, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
I while ago I discussed the problem with an ntpd server that has to
be synchronized to a GPSDO that provides PPS but no absolute time.
After the usual discussion about you should not want that, a solution
was
Rob,
Looks like a bug anterior to your version. I see the same issue with
version=ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o whether or not there is a preferred local clock
or not, and whether or not there are other active server associations.
One for Harlen if it has not already been flagged.
Tue Jul 29
On 2014-07-29, A C agcarver+...@acarver.net wrote:
On 2014-07-29 11:33, William Unruh wrote:
On 2014-07-29, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
The reasoning is that once the time is locked to PPS, it should remain
close enough for the local clock to be trusted as an absolute time
source (this
On 2014-07-29 12:46, William Unruh wrote:
On 2014-07-29, A C agcarver+...@acarver.net wrote:
On 2014-07-29 11:33, William Unruh wrote:
[1] ATOM's own documentation suggest maxpoll of 4 to 6 to keep the clock
synced to PPS. But that pins everything else to the same value unless a
minpoll is
mike cook michael.c...@sfr.fr wrote:
Rob,
Looks like a bug anterior to your version. I see the same issue with
version=ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o whether or not there is a preferred local
clock or not, and whether or not there are other active server associations.
One for Harlen if it has
A C agcarver+...@acarver.net wrote:
On 2014-07-29 11:33, William Unruh wrote:
On 2014-07-29, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
The reasoning is that once the time is locked to PPS, it should remain
close enough for the local clock to be trusted as an absolute time
source (this system is rarely
On 2014-07-29 14:46, Rob wrote:
mike cook michael.c...@sfr.fr wrote:
Rob,
Looks like a bug anterior to your version. I see the same issue with
version=ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o whether or not there is a preferred local clock
or not, and whether or not there are other active server
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Brian Inglis
brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca wrote:
As I discovered recently under similar circumstances, offline servers are
considered
falsetickers, and if you have insufficient other candidates, or fewer than
3, nothing
gets selected.
I don't think I'm
On 2014-07-29 21:32, Paul wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Brian Inglis
brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca wrote:
As I discovered recently under similar circumstances, offline servers are
considered falsetickers, and if you have insufficient other candidates, or
fewer than 3, nothing gets
12 matches
Mail list logo
