[ntp:questions] PPS + Win2008R2-64 bit

2014-09-09 Thread valizadeh65
NTP+PPS works just fine on XP/32 and Win7/32. Here is what i have on ntpq -p remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter == oGPS_NMEA(1) .GPS.0 l 72 16 3600.000

Re: [ntp:questions] PPS + Win2008R2-64 bit

2014-09-09 Thread David Woolley
On 09/09/14 06:46, valizade...@gmail.com wrote: 1-Is the not digitally signed normal in screenshots 3?? Almost certainly. There is a cost in being able to create digital signatures acceptable to Microsoft. ___ questions mailing list

Re: [ntp:questions] PPS + Win2008R2-64 bit

2014-09-09 Thread David Taylor
On 09/09/2014 06:46, valizade...@gmail.com wrote: NTP+PPS works just fine on XP/32 and Win7/32. Here is what i have on ntpq -p remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter == oGPS_NMEA(1)

Re: [ntp:questions] PPS + Win2008R2-64 bit

2014-09-09 Thread David Taylor
On 09/09/2014 07:57, David Woolley wrote: On 09/09/14 06:46, valizade...@gmail.com wrote: 1-Is the not digitally signed normal in screenshots 3?? Almost certainly. There is a cost in being able to create digital signatures acceptable to Microsoft. Strangely, David, I see the same, and yet

[ntp:questions] Compensating for asymmetric delay on a per-peer/server basis?

2014-09-09 Thread Rich Wales
Is there a way to compensate for asymmetric delay to/from one specific peer or server? My home LAN is connected to my school's network via a cable modem. There appears to be a consistent asymmetry of 2-3 msec between my home and the school's network. I can see this by comparing the time on my

Re: [ntp:questions] Compensating for asymmetric delay on a per-peer/server basis?

2014-09-09 Thread Rob
Rich Wales ri...@richw.org wrote: Is there a way to compensate for asymmetric delay to/from one specific peer or server? My home LAN is connected to my school's network via a cable modem. There appears to be a consistent asymmetry of 2-3 msec between my home and the school's network. I can

Re: [ntp:questions] Compensating for asymmetric delay on a per-peer/server basis?

2014-09-09 Thread Rich Wales
Replying to Rob: Yes, you can use: fudge 1.2.3.4 time1 -0.002 or similar. see the manual. This didn't work. And the following error message appeared in my syslog: inappropriate address 10.0.229.163 for the fudge command, line ignored As best I can tell from the online manual, the

Re: [ntp:questions] Compensating for asymmetric delay on a per-peer/server basis?

2014-09-09 Thread Paul
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Rich Wales ri...@richw.org wrote: I checked the manual before asking my question Good start, so many don't -- even years later. I might point you at The Huff-n'-Puff Filter but perhaps you could explain your concern. An error in the small millisecond range is

Re: [ntp:questions] Compensating for asymmetric delay on a per-peer/server basis?

2014-09-09 Thread Harlan Stenn
The issue is that the huff-n-puff filter will work in the case where a symmetrical delay becomes asymmetric, and it will tolerate or accommodate an asymmetric delay (caused by a large download, for example) for some period of time. This is a case where there is reasonably-understood asymmetry for