On Sat, 18 Oct 2014, Brian Utterback wrote:
We could turn it around and say that you refuse to accept that it isn't
a bug. Perhaps the better tack to take is that both sides accept it as
problematic and try to understand why and how to fix it.
You can't really say much about both sides,
Am 06.10.2014 09:00, schrieb Rob:
Rich Wales ri...@richw.org wrote:
Unless at least one of the known modem time services supports or requires
a very high baud rate, BTW, I'm unconvinced that supporting anything higher
than 9600 is really necessary for this application.
Using the highest
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
I'm not saying the current behavior can't be improved, I'm just saying
that if there is an issue I want it discussed and tracked in a bug
report, not some number of email threads.
There's clearly a bug*. I've submitted two
