The ustiming.org NTP server in NYC was consistently wrong for a long time;
I have not looked at it lately. If the government is going to privatize
serving time, then it has to exercise more effective oversight.
The other side of the coin is, where is the money in serving time?
The management
Sort of
Lots of interesting stuff.
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunitymode=formid=4f5c8b176af03d89abb1a318624c944b
SUMMARY: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Department
of Commerce, seeks information from the public on NIST's potential
transition of time services
Paul wrote:
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunitymode=formid=4f5c8b176af03d89abb1a318624c944b
SUMMARY: National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST), Department of Commerce, seeks information from
the public on NIST's potential transition of time services
from a NIST-only service
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:20:55PM -0700, E-Mail Sent to this address will be
added to the BlackLists wrote:
Certichron (Time-Evidence Services) via
ustiming.org (USTS) The United States Time Server Foundation
is already doing that?
No, they're not.
They are already a
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added
to the BlackLists Null@blacklist.anitech-systems.invalid wrote:
Certichron is already doing that?
I'm curious what punctuation you intended.
They are already a significant portion of the NIST NTP servers
They
