On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:13:01AM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> What do you think about the following alternative: convert all existing patch
> options to -P, and keep all current arguments as they are.
I like changing all existing -p to -P, and I see you've done that. However,
you change
Gary,
I have applied the uncontentious part now. Attached is the rest that I didn't
apply.
Andreas
PS.
Please don't send whitespace changes together with real code changes in the
same patch; it causes extra work.
---
quilt/applied.in | 12 +---
quilt/delete.in| 16 ++
Hello Gary,
On Friday 27 January 2006 03:30, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Morgen Andreas!
>
> Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 January 2006 16:22, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >>I'll generate a patch after the release.
> >
> > Why not do it now? There's still enough time left.
>
> Okay. Atta
On Thursday 26 January 2006 16:22, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> I'll generate a patch after the release.
Why not do it now? There's still enough time left.
Andreas
___
Quilt-dev mailing list
Quilt-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qu
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Gary,
Salut Jean,
> On 2006-01-26, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> With my UI hat on: quilt currently has a command "remove" that is used
>> to remove a file from the changed list in the current patch. The command
>> used to remove a patch from the series is "delete". For co
Hi Andreas,
On 2005-01-26, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > regarding to quotes, we have variety of quoting style:
> > (...)
>
> I think we can remove all such quoting. Jean, would you maybe like to
> look into this while updating French?
Call me a knitpicker, but this isn't a translation issue. W
On Thursday 26 January 2006 10:36, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Yashi,
>
> On 2006-01-26, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> > > > one question, just noticed when I glanced delete.in, it has following
> > > > strings:
> > > >
> > > > #: quilt/delete.in:107
> > > > msgid "Removing patch %s failed\\n"
> > > >
> > >
On Thursday 26 January 2006 10:18, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> regarding to quotes, we have variety of quoting style:
>
> - 'foo'
> - `foo'
> - "foo"
> - ``foo''
>
> I usually don't care but when I'm looking at po file too much these
> boring stuff start to annoy my eyes. ;-P
I think we can remove all
Hi Gary,
On 2006-01-26, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> With my UI hat on: quilt currently has a command "remove" that is used
> to remove a file from the changed list in the current patch. The command
> used to remove a patch from the series is "delete". For consistency, in
> these contexts, the mes
Hi Andreas, Yashi,
Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2006 08:09, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
>> one question, just noticed when I glanced delete.in, it has following
>> strings:
>>
>> #: quilt/delete.in:107
>> msgid "Removing patch %s failed\\n"
>>
>> #: quilt/delete.in:117
>> msgid "Fa
On Thursday 26 January 2006 08:09, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> one question, just noticed when I glanced delete.in, it has following
> strings:
>
> #: quilt/delete.in:107
> msgid "Removing patch %s failed\\n"
>
> #: quilt/delete.in:117
> msgid "Failed to remove patch %s\\n"
>
> would you guys take a pat
Hi Yashi,
On 2006-01-26, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> > > one question, just noticed when I glanced delete.in, it has following
> > > strings:
> > >
> > > #: quilt/delete.in:107
> > > msgid "Removing patch %s failed\\n"
> > >
> > > #: quilt/delete.in:117
> > > msgid "Failed to remove patch %s\\n"
BTW,
Hi Jean,
At Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:46:21 +0100 (CET),
Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> On 2006-01-26, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> > one question, just noticed when I glanced delete.in, it has following
> > strings:
> >
> > #: quilt/delete.in:107
> > msgid "Removing patch %s failed\\n"
> >
> > #: quilt/delete.in:1
Hi Yashi,
On 2006-01-26, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> one question, just noticed when I glanced delete.in, it has following
> strings:
>
> #: quilt/delete.in:107
> msgid "Removing patch %s failed\\n"
>
> #: quilt/delete.in:117
> msgid "Failed to remove patch %s\\n"
>
> would you guys take a patch to me
At Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:09:00 +0900,
yashi wrote:
>
> At Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:44:08 +0100,
> Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> [...]
> > Yasushi, Jean, would you mind having a look at the translation files once
> > again?
>
> will do so in a couple of days.
well, I just did. just to sync with the cur
At Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:44:08 +0100,
Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
[...]
> Yasushi, Jean, would you mind having a look at the translation files once
> again?
will do so in a couple of days.
one question, just noticed when I glanced delete.in, it has following
strings:
#: quilt/delete.in:107
msgid "
The files_in_patch improvement is very nice. I'll take that right away,
thanks.
Andreas
___
Quilt-dev mailing list
Quilt-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 02:43, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On 1/24/06, Andreas Gruenbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 23 January 2006 22:23, Dean Roehrich wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:44:08PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > > I still need to fix ftw by either using
On 1/24/06, Andreas Gruenbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2006 22:23, Dean Roehrich wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:44:08PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > I still need to fix ftw by either using nftw or something else; then we
> > > should be ready for 0.43.
>
On Monday 23 January 2006 22:23, Dean Roehrich wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:44:08PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > I still need to fix ftw by either using nftw or something else; then we
> > should be ready for 0.43.
>
> The "something else" that I'm using today is sun-backup-files-2.
Hi Andreas,
> I still need to fix ftw by either using nftw or something else; then we
> should
> be ready for 0.43.
Given the amount of changes that were merged in CVS these last few
days, we might as well number it 0.44, if not even more (0.50?).
> Yasushi, Jean, would you mind having a look
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:44:08PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> I still need to fix ftw by either using nftw or something else; then we
> should
> be ready for 0.43.
The "something else" that I'm using today is sun-backup-files-2.diff from
http://zeroj.hda0.net/quilt-0.43-patches-v5/
Thi
On Monday 23 January 2006 18:33, Dean Roehrich wrote:
> On solaris we need to use the approved version of tr when
> checking the version of patch.
Applied, thanks.
I still need to fix ftw by either using nftw or something else; then we should
be ready for 0.43.
Yasushi, Jean, would you mind hav
On solaris we need to use the approved version of tr when
checking the version of patch.
Dean
Index: work20060123/configure.ac
===
--- work20060123.orig/configure.ac 2006-01-23 11:26:24.283247000 -0600
+++ work20060123/configur
24 matches
Mail list logo
