On 06/12/2018 03:03 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:54 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> wrote:
>>
>> mutt sets this and the tip-bot, too. The difference is that quilt also
>> sets the filename parameter. Do the mutt or tip-bot mails look flowed?
>
> No, they look fine.
>
>
On 2018-06-12 21:43:48 [+0200], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Also, note that I'm not at all sure that it's _just_ the
> >
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > that triggers this. There might be something else in those emails that
> > triggers it but that's the thing that stands out.
>
> It
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:52 AM Andreas Grünbacher
> wrote:
> >
> > Quilt uses those Content-Disposition headers to preserve the patch
> > filenames;
>
> That' what I was assuming, but does anybody really care?
People might have scripts using it but
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:52 AM Andreas Grünbacher
wrote:
>
> Quilt uses those Content-Disposition headers to preserve the patch
> filenames;
That' what I was assuming, but does anybody really care?
If you do things one patch at a time, maybe it's convenient, but then
it doesn't sound like a
2018-06-12 18:47 GMT+02:00 Linus Torvalds :
> "
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 1:39 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>> As mentioned by Linus, swait is exclusive mode and had better behave like it
>> and be named like it.
>
> Ack on the patches.
>
> I do note how quilt emails are really hard to read,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:54 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
>
> mutt sets this and the tip-bot, too. The difference is that quilt also
> sets the filename parameter. Do the mutt or tip-bot mails look flowed?
No, they look fine.
And yes, the difference looks to be that filename. Looking at
