> Hey,
>
> (re-adding the list to the Cc, I assume you accidentally didn't include
> it in your reply)
Hi, Florian.
Yes. Sorry, my fault. Thanks for adding it back.
> That's true, and a valid concern. Currently we just can test for
> membership of a host in a set, which is O(1). Host blocking lo
Hey,
(re-adding the list to the Cc, I assume you accidentally didn't include
it in your reply)
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 09:19:23PM +0200, Viacheslav Chimishuk wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 07:16:45PM +0200, Viacheslav Chimishuk wrote:
> > > > > I propose to treat `~` prefix as a substring ins
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 07:16:45PM +0200, Viacheslav Chimishuk wrote:
> > > I propose to treat `~` prefix as a substring instead of domain
> > > name. For example, next file parses to substrings list.
> >
> > Again, use URL patterns. I will not accept any contributions inventing
> > yet another URL
> > I propose to treat `~` prefix as a substring instead of domain
> > name. For example, next file parses to substrings list.
>
> Again, use URL patterns. I will not accept any contributions inventing
> yet another URL format, no matter how simple. Let's be consistent with
> what the rest of quteb
Viacheslav Chimishuk writes:
>> How would the line to block Youtube ads look like?
>>
>> FWIW I'm against introducing another URL pattern format, and I'd rather
>> use the existing URL pattern class which is also used for ":set -u"
>> (aka "per-domain settings"). See:
>> https://github.com/quteb
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:28:30PM +0200, Viacheslav Chimishuk wrote:
> > How would the line to block Youtube ads look like?
> >
> > FWIW I'm against introducing another URL pattern format, and I'd rather
> > use the existing URL pattern class which is also used for ":set -u"
> > (aka "per-domain s
I can see ublock uses regexp for its list. Implementing regexp support
we can reuse their files, which will get us a huge
benefit. Unfortunately their format is not compatible with UrlPattern
we use and looks much more complicated than a simple regexp. IMHO, it
is better to start with simple substr
> Sounds great. The Compiler is currently working on a plugin system,
> which I believe would make this even easier to implement. If I recall
> correctly, even the current hostblocking would be extracted to a plugin
> so we could just extend that to include the functionality you
> described.
Yeah,
> How would the line to block Youtube ads look like?
>
> FWIW I'm against introducing another URL pattern format, and I'd rather
> use the existing URL pattern class which is also used for ":set -u"
> (aka "per-domain settings"). See:
> https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/issues/4188
I was
Hey!
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:03:43PM +0200, Viacheslav Chimishuk wrote:
> I'm thinking about extending existing ad blocking module to allow
> single URL blocking. For now we support two file formats:
> host-per-line and UNIX hosts file format. My idea is the add third
> format support: URL subs
Hi,
Sounds great. The Compiler is currently working on a plugin system,
which I believe would make this even easier to implement. If I recall
correctly, even the current hostblocking would be extracted to a plugin
so we could just extend that to include the functionality you
described.
Sincerely,
11 matches
Mail list logo
