Kjell Konis wrote:
On 6 Jul 2005, at 22:06, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Marie-Hélène Ouellette wrote:
I'm using the R v1.11 on Macintoch and I seem to have a problem
with the
There is no version 1.11, and there never was. Current is 2.1.1
anything
older than 2.x.y is unsupported these days.
arnima == arnima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thu, 7 Jul 2005 05:40:53 +0200 (CEST) writes:
arnima There are a couple of harmless typos in the
arnima documentation for the stats::SSD function, where
arnima varianve should be variance
arnima followint should be following
On 7/7/2005 10:16 AM, Marie-Hélène Ouellette wrote:
At 19:46 2005-07-06, you wrote:
Marie-Hélène Ouellette wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm working on Mac OS X and R-2.1.0 (by the way, sorry for the multiple
emails last time, had a technical problem, and thanks for the
constructive comments.)
I have a
Anyone who is interested in using optimal colour palettes should
look at the work of Cindy Brewer: www.colorbrewer.org
I have written code to use her colour schemes in R. It is
included below. Perhaps someone may find this interesting enough
to work into a package.
Included also is a function
Do you mean something like:
http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/RColorBrewer.html
?
Andy
From: Peter Kleiweg
Anyone who is interested in using optimal colour palettes should
look at the work of Cindy Brewer: www.colorbrewer.org
I have written code to use her colour
Liaw, Andy schreef op de 7e dag van de hooimaand van het jaar 2005:
Do you mean something like:
http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/RColorBrewer.html
?
Now I feel silly. Well, it was a nice exercise.
--
Peter Kleiweg
http://www.let.rug.nl/~kleiweg/
This topic already came up about a week ago on R-devel
Subject: write.csv suggestion
[ too bad that R-devel is not available via RSiteSearch() ...
{I could send you the back archives, Jon, if you are interested} ]
There, Brian Ripley, explained why this is not a bug, since
it works as
This may not be inconsistent with the documentation but it is
inconsistent with good practice. Wrappers should, in general,
set the default values, as the poster rightly indicated, and not the
values themselves. Its not a coincidence that multiple people
have mentioned this.
On 7/7/05,
On 7/7/2005 12:38 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
This may not be inconsistent with the documentation but it is
inconsistent with good practice. Wrappers should, in general,
set the default values, as the poster rightly indicated, and not the
values themselves. Its not a coincidence that
I just checked the svn. I did not realize it had been changed that way
so you are right, its better and possibly marginally acceptable although
I do think it would be preferable to set the defaults rather than the
values though I would no longer argue as strongly.
On 7/7/05, Duncan Murdoch
10 matches
Mail list logo