[Rd] R CMD Rdconv file.Rd --type=Ssgm \code{x} should use (PR#8290)

2005-11-08 Thread timh
I'm trying: R CMD Rdconv file.Rd --type=Ssgm If file.Rd contains \code{x} then this is currently translated as x I suggest instead translating to x (provided that R CMD Sd2Rd is changed to support the tag; I just submitted that bug separately). Note that this i

[Rd] R CMD Sd2Rd a.sgml > a.Rd does not recognize tag (PR#8289)

2005-11-08 Thread timh
I'm trying: R CMD Sd2Rd file.sgml > file.Rd If file.sgml contains x this should be translated to \code{x} in the .Rd file, but is not. It should be treated the same as the old x I'm using: Cygwin (uname gives: CYGWIN_NT-5.1) (installed 10 Oct 05) Perl 5.8.7 bu

Re: [Rd] R thread safe

2005-11-08 Thread Andrew Piskorski
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:57:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would like to accelerate my R computation by using parallel OpenMP > compilers (e.g from Pathscale) on a 2-processor AMD server and I > would like to know whether R is a tread safe library. The main R is not thread safe, but o

[Rd] [OTAnn] Feedback

2005-11-08 Thread shenanigans
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users. We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband. Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01 community webapp. Our newest version adds broadcas

Re: [Rd] bug in windows GUI/script editor (PR#8288)

2005-11-08 Thread murdoch
On 11/8/2005 11:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Roberto Ugoccioni > Version: 2.2.0 > OS: Windows 2000 > Submission from: (NULL) (193.203.232.5) > > > Running Windows 2000 Professional, all patches up to nov 8, 2005. > > >>version > > _ > platform i386-pc-min

[Rd] bug in windows GUI/script editor (PR#8288)

2005-11-08 Thread roberto . ugoccioni
Full_Name: Roberto Ugoccioni Version: 2.2.0 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (193.203.232.5) Running Windows 2000 Professional, all patches up to nov 8, 2005. > version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, ming

Re: [Rd] R-2.2.0: malloc probelm in regex code (PR#8287)

2005-11-08 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Please try R-patched, as this has already been reported for AIX and addressed in R-patched and R-devel. On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Gordon Lack > Version: 2.2.0 > OS: OSF1/Tur64 > Submission from: (NULL) (193.128.25.20) > > > R-2.2.0 fails to build on OSF1 systems. >

[Rd] R build under mandriva 10.2

2005-11-08 Thread Gilles GUILLOT
After upgrading from mandrake 10.1 to mandriva 10.2 I can't build shared archive with R 2.2.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]$ R CMD SHLIB main.f sub.f wrapper.c gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o main.so main.o sub.o wrapper.o -lg2c -lm -lgcc_s /usr//bin/ld: cannot find -lg2c collect2: ld returned 1 exit

[Rd] R-2.2.0: malloc probelm in regex code (PR#8287)

2005-11-08 Thread gml4410
Full_Name: Gordon Lack Version: 2.2.0 OS: OSF1/Tur64 Submission from: (NULL) (193.128.25.20) R-2.2.0 fails to build on OSF1 systems. . make[4]: Leaving directory `/R-2.2.0/src/library/tools/src Error in list.files(path, pattern, all.files, full.names, recursive) : invalid 'patter

Re: [Rd] dgamma error condition?

2005-11-08 Thread Ben Bolker
thanks. would you like a patch? (seems easy enough but I thought I'd offer) looks like library/stats/R/distn.R and nmath/rgamma.c need fixing; looks like qgamma may not check for scale<0 in C code either ... Ben Bolker Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Ben Bolker wrote: > >>

Re: [Rd] mosaicplot() update and clarification

2005-11-08 Thread Achim Zeileis
Torsten, thanks for pointing this out. Jay, just to expand a little on this explanation: > `mosaicplot' is a function in package `graphics' (and lists you as the > author) and `mosaic' is a function in package `vcd'. There _was_ a > function `vcd::mosaicplot' in older versions of the `vcd' packa

Re: [Rd] mosaicplot() update and clarification

2005-11-08 Thread Torsten Hothorn
> > All, > > Again, my apologies for seeming to claim credit for > your other mosaic implementation. However, there are two > sources of this confusion, and I hope the following helps. > > 1. "my" implementation (e.g. the one originally written for > and included in S-Plus, then modified and impr