Hi Ben,
I have often asked myself such question and often
come back to the following additional options:
(4) Use '...' and ensure encapsulated functions/calls (foo2 and foo3) also
have '...' within their arguments. There is no problem to call 3dspehre with
a list of arguments that include
On 6/30/2006 2:30 AM, Eric Lecoutre wrote:
Hi Ben,
I have often asked myself such question and often
come back to the following additional options:
(4) Use '...' and ensure encapsulated functions/calls (foo2 and foo3) also
have '...' within their arguments. There is no problem to call
Full_Name: René Locher
Version: Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01)
OS: i386, mingw32
Submission from: (NULL) (160.85.104.70)
The problem seems to occur only, when you want to plot a vector containing a NA
value at position 2 and the plotting type is s or S.
## start of code
Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- It breaks the partial argument matching, e.g.
foo1(siz = 3)
would act just like the above, instead of like
foo1(size = 3)
Is this viewed as a feature? Having ( dataset=3 ) foul the namespace
for d, da, dat, data, etc... sounds miserable to
15th International Conference on Computing
CIC 2006
November 21 to 24, 2006
Mexico City, Mexico
http://magno-congreso.cic.ipn.mx/CIC-2006
Proceedings: IEEE CS Press.
Deadline:
July 1 expression of interest (recommended),
Here is an approach. fn.dots takes a character string, fn.name, such as
a function name and a named list, dots. If fn.name is f, say, then
it returns all components of dots whose name is of the form f.somestring
removing the f. prefix as well as components containing unprefixed
strings. It would
PD == Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 29 Jun 2006 12:18:13 +0200 writes:
PD BXC (Bendix Carstensen) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PD
PD The function addmargins() adds margins to a table, but returns a matrix.
PD But even after converted to a table the print.zero=. option of
PD
Joerg == Joerg van den Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:29:26 +0200 writes:
Joerg I raised this question quite some time ago but it quitly went down
the
Joerg river. I'll give it a second try (before keeping my modified version
of
Joerg matplot for ever...):
In ?writeLines the word 'call' should be 'calls' in the first line
under 'Details'
If the 'con' is a character string, the function call 'file' to
I am using:
Windows XP R version 2.4.0 Under development (unstable) (2006-06-20 r38361)
__
On 6/30/2006 10:49 AM, Allen S. Rout wrote:
Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- It breaks the partial argument matching, e.g.
foo1(siz = 3)
would act just like the above, instead of like
foo1(size = 3)
Is this viewed as a feature? Having ( dataset=3 ) foul the namespace
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:03:29 -0400, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think there are mixed feelings about whether it is a feature or a
misfeature, but it's a very old property of the S language.
Oh well, understood. :)
- Allen S. Rout
__
On 6/30/2006 12:33 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
In ?writeLines the word 'call' should be 'calls' in the first line
under 'Details'
If the 'con' is a character string, the function call 'file' to
I am using:
Windows XP R version 2.4.0 Under development (unstable) (2006-06-20 r38361)
I was just considering trying to clean up the arguments to a function
that calls other functions,
and was playin with a suggestion Achim made during a conversation at
useR. The idea is, instead of using list(), use a small function to
construct and check arguments. My hope was to be able to do
On 6/30/2006 4:19 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
I was just considering trying to clean up the arguments to a function
that calls other functions,
and was playin with a suggestion Achim made during a conversation at
useR. The idea is, instead of using list(), use a small function to
construct
On 6/30/2006 5:12 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/30/2006 4:19 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
I was just considering trying to clean up the arguments to a function
that calls other functions,
and was playin with a suggestion Achim made during a conversation at
useR. The
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/30/2006 5:12 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/30/2006 4:19 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
I was just considering trying to clean up the arguments to a
function that calls other functions,
and was playin with a suggestion Achim made during a
If an Rd file has only one keyword entry then
the Splus sgm file made with Rdconv --type=SSgm
has no keyword entries.
To reproduce:
Use prompt() to make a skeleton help file
R f-function(x)log(1+x)-log1p(x)
R prompt(f)
Created file named 'f.Rd'.
Edit the file and move
17 matches
Mail list logo
