Re: [Rd] Installation package of R-GUI (PR#9098)

2006-07-26 Thread Simon Urbanek
Frederic, On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Frédéric Moser > Version: R-GUI, the last one ^^ What is "the last one"? > OS: Macosx 10.4.7 > Submission from: (NULL) (83.228.155.25) > > > The installer say that I can't install R-GUI, because I don't have > Macos

Re: [Rd] R CMD SHLIB flags

2006-07-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 26 July 2006 at 16:59, Thomas Lumley wrote: | | How can one specify multiple extra flags to R CMD SHLIB? The example in | R-exts section 5.5 | MAKEFLAGS="CFLAGS=-O3" R CMD SHLIB *.c | works for a single flag, but when I try | MAKEFLAGS="CFLAGS=-g -O2 -Wall" R CMD SHLIB *.c | only the

[Rd] R CMD SHLIB flags

2006-07-26 Thread Thomas Lumley
How can one specify multiple extra flags to R CMD SHLIB? The example in R-exts section 5.5 MAKEFLAGS="CFLAGS=-O3" R CMD SHLIB *.c works for a single flag, but when I try MAKEFLAGS="CFLAGS=-g -O2 -Wall" R CMD SHLIB *.c only the first flag is used and the rest seem to be ignored (version

Re: [Rd] .Call question

2006-07-26 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Rossi, Peter E. wrote: > > Writing R Ext says to treat R objects that are arguments to .Call as > read only (i.e. don't modify). > > I have a long list of lists that and I want to avoid the overhead of a > copy in my C code. I would just like to modify some of the elements >

[Rd] .Call question

2006-07-26 Thread Rossi, Peter E.
Writing R Ext says to treat R objects that are arguments to .Call as read only (i.e. don't modify). I have a long list of lists that and I want to avoid the overhead of a copy in my C code. I would just like to modify some of the elements of list by replacing them with elements of exactly the

Re: [Rd] pari/gp interface

2006-07-26 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On 7/25/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The issue is that system() on Windows does not run a shell, so piping is > not going to be available: used shell() instead. Then the problem is > that the shell available is OS-specific, and pretty minimal on Windows > 95/98/ME. If you c

Re: [Rd] Patch to allow negative argument in head() and tail()

2006-07-26 Thread Vincent Goulet
Le Mardi 18 Juillet 2006 04:42, Martin Maechler a écrit : > > "Vincent" == Vincent Goulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > on Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:03:34 -0400 writes: > > Vincent> Dear developeRs (and other abuseRs ;-), > > Vincent> I would like to contribute a patch against > Vincent

[Rd] Installation package of R-GUI (PR#9098)

2006-07-26 Thread moser . frederic
Full_Name: Frédéric Moser Version: R-GUI, the last one OS: Macosx 10.4.7 Submission from: (NULL) (83.228.155.25) The installer say that I can't install R-GUI, because I don't have Macosx 10.4.4 installed, but my powerbook g4 1.33ghz run the 10.4.7 ... Strange :P Thanks, and R for mac os x looks

Re: [Rd] largest acceptable lookup table in a package

2006-07-26 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
A frame of reference based on: http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib is the quantiles of the size distribution of the compressed packages: 0% 5% 25% 50% 75% 95% 100% 58 58001700062500 249500 150 1500 On 7/26/06, Robin Hankin <[EM

Re: [Rd] largest acceptable lookup table in a package

2006-07-26 Thread Seth Falcon
Robin Hankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One of my packages needs a look-up table of pre-calculated > numbers in the data directory. > > What is the largest size matrix that would be an acceptable datafile in > an R package? > Do you need the entire lookup table in memory at once? If not, you c

[Rd] largest acceptable lookup table in a package

2006-07-26 Thread Robin Hankin
Hi One of my packages needs a look-up table of pre-calculated numbers in the data directory. I would like to have the matrix as large as possible. What is the largest size matrix that would be an acceptable datafile in an R package? [ The table is a square, upper triangular matrix consisting

[Rd] WSEAS

2006-07-26 Thread WSEAS Publications
(write WSEAS in the Subject, when you reply) Dear Sir, You have included in your web page: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/05/01/1989.html#options2 some Information for the site: www.hiest.org that it is NOT true any longer. We did not authorize to include it Please, remove it and remov