On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> Herve,
>
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 11:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Recently I needed to download a few R packages for Unix, Windows
> > and Mac OS X. The idea was to put them all together on a USB key in
> > order to be able to install them on s
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: ashutosh goyal
> Version: 1.9.1
> OS: Linux
> Submission from: (NULL) (192.147.57.6)
>
>
> I am calling a R script from shell prompt using "Rcmd BATCH script.R" option
> where I am seeing this error. Any idea what can be the reason??
1)
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, miguel manese wrote:
> Thanks for the fix. I'm guessing the rules are:
>
> a. a non S3 method is bound to the global env, and will see the def'n
> of an "S3-ized" method (e.g. I made is.list() generic and lapply, w/c
> is not generic, gets the S3-ized is.list)
> b. an S3 metho
Those functions are messy (StringFromRaw was always private), and are
really just part of coerceVector and asInteger etc (which are the public
interface).
What RdbiPgSql does is not currently correct. It has
PROTECT(rowNames = allocVector(STRSXP, rows));
for (row = 0; row < rows; ++row)
You might want to publish you package on some URL and perhaps someone
reading this list looks at it and is able to help, but without seeing
the details, it wil be hard and only guesswork.
Uwe Ligges
Selwyn-Lloyd McPherson wrote:
> If I do R CMD CHECK, R uses the makefile that came with the sour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: ashutosh goyal
> Version: 1.9.1
> OS: Linux
> Submission from: (NULL) (192.147.57.6)
>
>
> I am calling a R script from shell prompt using "Rcmd BATCH script.R" option
> where I am seeing this error. Any idea what can be the reason??
If this is a question,
Herve,
On Aug 7, 2006, at 11:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Recently I needed to download a few R packages for Unix, Windows
> and Mac OS X. The idea was to put them all together on a USB key in
> order to be able to install them on systems without network
> connection.
>
> It worked fin
"Gregory Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Everyone:
>
> I'm getting this error when I try to call a C routine from within an R
> package:
>
> Error in .C("testC", as.integer(length(x)), ans = double(1), PACKAGE =
> "mypkg") : C entry point "testC" not in DLL for package "mypkg"
>
> here are
Hi Everyone:
I'm getting this error when I try to call a C routine from within an R package:
Error in .C("testC", as.integer(length(x)), ans = double(1), PACKAGE =
"mypkg") :
C entry point "testC" not in DLL for package "mypkg"
here are some useful outputs:
nm mypkg.so | grep testC
If you are writing the generic then you could use the same .Rd
file to list and document the methods or just mention them in the
text. If the generic is not part of your package you could use the
-class.Rd file to do that or you could have separate .Rd pages for
specific methods. I don't think i
Hi,
In commit 38652, StringFromInteger (among others) was removed from R's
public API. I've just come across a Bioconductor package, RdbiPgSql,
that uses this function.
Is there an alternative that is in the public API? If not, it would
be nice to be able to reuse these sorts of helper function
Thanks for the fix. I'm guessing the rules are:
a. a non S3 method is bound to the global env, and will see the def'n
of an "S3-ized" method (e.g. I made is.list() generic and lapply, w/c
is not generic, gets the S3-ized is.list)
b. an S3 method implementation is bound to the namespace it was
defi
svn diff against r-devel
Index: R/doc/manual/R-exts.texi
===
--- R/doc/manual/R-exts.texi(revision 38809)
+++ R/doc/manual/R-exts.texi(working copy)
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@
@file{.Rin} file containing code which in turn creates t
Full_Name: ashutosh goyal
Version: 1.9.1
OS: Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (192.147.57.6)
I am calling a R script from shell prompt using "Rcmd BATCH script.R" option
where I am seeing this error. Any idea what can be the reason??
__
R-devel@r-project.
Thank you Gabor for this explanation. No I get it! However,
I am still not clear on documenting generic methods in my case.
I could document only the methods that have more arguments than
simple ones, in my case classX, but then the output in help
page will only be for classC and I have to mention
If I do R CMD CHECK, R uses the makefile that came with the source
files to create the .o files but does not create the .so file (I
still get the "cp: *.so: No such file or directory" error). I tried
playing around with that makefile but to no avail. I can use R CMD
SHLIB to create the .so
Hi lists,
Recently I needed to download a few R packages for Unix, Windows
and Mac OS X. The idea was to put them all together on a USB key
in order to be able to install them on systems without network connection.
It worked fine for the "src" and "win.binary" packages but I had the
following pr
Exporting a method allows the user to access the method directly
as opposed to calling the generic.
For example, try:
methods(plot)
The methods listed with stars are not exported although they are
still available through the generic. For example:
plot(ts(1:10))
plot.ts(ts(1:10))
both
From: Martin Maechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Gorjanc" == Gorjanc Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 7 Aug 2006 11:59:31 +0200 writes:
Gorjanc> Hello!
Gorjanc> Say I have
Gorjanc> myMethod <- function(x, ...)
Gorjanc> UseMethod("myMethod")
Gorjanc> myMetho
> "Gorjanc" == Gorjanc Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 7 Aug 2006 11:59:31 +0200 writes:
Gorjanc> Hello!
Gorjanc> Say I have
Gorjanc> myMethod <- function(x, ...)
Gorjanc> UseMethod("myMethod")
Gorjanc> myMethod.classA <- function(x, ...)
Gorjanc> ...
Hello!
Say I have
myMethod <- function(x, ...)
UseMethod("myMethod")
myMethod.classA <- function(x, ...)
...
myMethod.classB <- function(x, ...)
...
myMethod.classC <- function(x, arg2, ...)
...
and I would like to properly document these as generics. Then I have to
use in usage section
\
It's a namepsace issue: any function in a namespace will see the
definition in base rather than yours.
quantile() is already generic, so why do you want to make sort() generic?
In particular, the function you show is not implementing much of the power
of sort (and in this case in particular not
22 matches
Mail list logo
