[Rd] describe function in package Hmisc and function format.dates in chron (PR#13087)

Full_Name: Kem Phillips Version: 2.7.1 (2008-06-23) OS: Windows Xp professional Submission from: (NULL) (98.221.200.108) The Hmisc function describe fails, giving the error message: Error in formatDateTime(dd, atx, !timeUsed) : could not find function format.dates Loading the

Re: [Rd] seg.fault from nlme::gnls() {was [R-sig-ME] GNLS Crash}

When I run this under valgrind with gctorture(TRUE) I see memory misuse in mat_mult (matrix.c, line 82): % R-2.8.0-dev --debugger=valgrind --debugger-args=--db-attach=yes ... copyright blah blah ... data(Orange) gctorture(TRUE) gnls(circumference ~ Asym/(1 + exp(-(age-xmid)/scal)) , + data =

Re: [Rd] Rterm.exe, windows event loop running in multiple threads?

Michael Lawrence writes: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Simon Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michael, Michael Lawrence wrote: For processing events, RGtk2 has moved away from using the old tcl_do hack and now synchronizes on the Windows event loop. In Rgui.exe this works fine

Re: [Rd] describe function in package Hmisc and function format.dates in chron (PR#13087)

This is because format.dates has become non-callable from outside the chron package. Until the next release of Hmisc you can download a fixed version of the describe function at http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/svn/R/Hmisc/trunk/R/describe.s Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Kem

[Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS)

I would like to do a SS type III analysis on a proportional odds logistic regression model. I use drop1(), but dropterm() shows the same behaviour. It works as expected for regular main effects models, however when the model includes an interaction effect it seems to have problems with matching

Re: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS)

Dear Jeroen, drop1() respects relationships of marginality among the terms in a model and won't drop a lower-order term (e.g., a main effect) when a higher-order relative (e.g., an interaction to which the main effect is marginal) is in the model. If you want a complete type-III ANOVA table and

Re: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS)

Jeroen Ooms wrote: I would like to do a SS type III analysis on a proportional odds logistic regression model. I use drop1(), but dropterm() shows the same behaviour. It works as expected for regular main effects models, however when the model includes an interaction effect it seems to have

[Rd] Planned mailing list timeout of several hours

There will be upcoming maintenance work on one of main network's server which will affect the MAIL server for all mailing lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or [EMAIL PROTECTED]). This change will take place on Wednesday October 1, from 9 p.m. (UTC+2) 3 p.m. (US East)

Re: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS)

Sorry for posting in -dev; I assumed a technical issue. Thanks very much for the responses, I've realized that interaction effects of categorical predictors are more complicated than I thought. I've read the contrasts help file and paragraph in the R manual about contrast, however I'm not quite

Re: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS)

Dear Jeroen, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen Ooms Sent: September-30-08 3:10 PM To: r-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS) Sorry for posting in -dev; I assumed a technical

[Rd] Typo in x11.Rd

Hi, There is a double the in x11.Rd: ...which is faster will depend on the the X11 connection Thank you, Stephen -- Rochester, Minn. USA __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel