Re: [Rd] conditionally import a namespace?

2008-10-31 Thread Felix Andrews
2008/10/31 Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 10/30/2008 10:44 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 10/30/2008 10:15 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: FA == Felix Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:40:17 +1100 writes: FA Dear R-devel, FA I have a problem defining the

[Rd] [BUG] [PATCH] R-2.8.0 failes to build without X support due to a typo (PR#13233)

2008-10-31 Thread bircoph
Full_Name: Andrew Version: 2.8.0 OS: Linux-2.6.x Submission from: (NULL) (78.107.248.171) R-2.8.0 failes to build without X support due to a typo in the source code. The following patch fixes this: --- src/main/platform.c.orig2008-10-31 02:59:45.0 +0300 +++ src/main/platform.c

[Rd] Problems with Sweave and pdf.options(encoding=ISOLatin7) (PR#13234)

2008-10-31 Thread zemlys
Hi, Sweave for some reason does not respect encoding setting in pdf.options. Everything is OK with ps.options. Thus when using non-default encoding for graphs, resulting graphics eps file is correct, but pdf file is not. Workaround is very simple, just use latex-dvips-ps2pdf chain to get the

[Rd] *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R terminated on R 2.6.2 to 2.8.0: logging a bug?

2008-10-31 Thread Corrado
Dear friends, there is a serious problem with RODBC on R from 2.6.2 to 2.8.0 on a postgresql 8.3 database. Let's say we define an empty dsn called test, with user postgres and password none. We test the connection with another application, and it works properly. When you call the database

Re: [Rd] (PR#13233) [BUG] [PATCH] R-2.8.0 failes to build without X support due to a typo

2008-10-31 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
This is -- already fixed in R-patched early last week. -- a duplicate of PR#13188. You were explicitly asked not to report on already fixed or already reported bugs -- see the FAQ. Note too that no one reported this during the alpha/beta test period for 2.8.0, so responding to requests for

Re: [Rd] *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R terminated on R 2.6.2 to 2.8.0: logging a bug?

2008-10-31 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Corrado wrote: Dear friends, there is a serious problem with RODBC on R from 2.6.2 to 2.8.0 on a postgresql 8.3 database. Let's say we define an empty dsn called test, with user postgres and password none. We test the connection with another application, and it works properly.

Re: [Rd] *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R terminated on R 2.6.2 to 2.8.0: logging a bug?

2008-10-31 Thread Corrado
I apologise The dsn is not empty, the database the dsn connects to is empty! You get the same error when connecting to a populated database. Regards On Friday 31 October 2008 12:26:39 Peter Dalgaard wrote: Corrado wrote: Dear friends, there is a serious problem with RODBC on R

Re: [Rd] *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R terminated on R 2.6.2 to 2.8.0: logging a bug?

2008-10-31 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Corrado wrote: I apologise The dsn is not empty, the database the dsn connects to is empty! You get the same error when connecting to a populated database. Do I? I wouldn't know... (You are _still_ not providing steps to reproduce the situation!) The actual maintainer might know,

Re: [Rd] *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R terminated on R 2.6.2 to 2.8.0: logging a bug?

2008-10-31 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Peter Dalgaard wrote: Corrado wrote: I apologise The dsn is not empty, the database the dsn connects to is empty! You get the same error when connecting to a populated database. Do I? I wouldn't know... (You are _still_ not providing steps to reproduce the

Re: [Rd] *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R terminated on R 2.6.2 to 2.8.0: logging a bug?

2008-10-31 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Peter Dalgaard wrote: Corrado wrote: I apologise The dsn is not empty, the database the dsn connects to is empty! You get the same error when connecting to a populated database. Do I? I wouldn't know... (You are _still_ not providing

Re: [Rd] *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R terminated on R 2.6.2 to 2.8.0: logging a bug?

2008-10-31 Thread Corrado
Dear friends, the problem is on a postgresql 8.3.1 database on a 64 platform (the setting described at the bottom of the previous email). If the problems is with the odbc driver, why do the other applications connect through odbc to the same databases without any problem? I do not think it is

Re: [Rd] *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R terminated on R 2.6.2 to 2.8.0: logging a bug?

2008-10-31 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 10/31/2008 11:09 AM, Corrado wrote: Dear friends, the problem is on a postgresql 8.3.1 database on a 64 platform (the setting described at the bottom of the previous email). If the problems is with the odbc driver, why do the other applications connect through odbc to the same databases

Re: [Rd] *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R terminated on R 2.6.2 to 2.8.0: logging a bug?

2008-10-31 Thread Corrado
On Friday 31 October 2008 16:29:13 you wrote: See Prof. Ripley's message. RODBC is passing a buffer and buffer size to the ODBC driver, and that driver is overflowing the buffer. You could probably hide this bug by making the buffer larger, but the real fix is for the driver to take account

Re: [Rd] *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R terminated on R 2.6.2 to 2.8.0: logging a bug?

2008-10-31 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 10/31/2008 12:57 PM, Corrado wrote: On Friday 31 October 2008 16:29:13 you wrote: See Prof. Ripley's message. RODBC is passing a buffer and buffer size to the ODBC driver, and that driver is overflowing the buffer. You could probably hide this bug by making the buffer larger, but the real