[Rd] Panel Data Unit Root tests

2009-01-30 Thread Jose Iparraguirre D'Elia
I could not find a package to run panel data unit root tests in R (there's a STATA module, though - PANELUNIT- and routines for Sarno and Taylor's MADF test, Levin-Lin-Chu's test, Im-Pesaran-Shin's Test, etc, to do this). Hence, I am toying with the idea of having a go at writing up one for R,

Re: [Rd] length of POSIXlt object (PR#13482)

2009-01-30 Thread Patrick Burns
'The R Inferno' page 93 and page 99. Patrick Burns patr...@burns-stat.com +44 (0)20 8525 0696 http://www.burns-stat.com (home of The R Inferno and A Guide for the Unwilling S User) twoutop...@gmail.com wrote: The length() of a POSIXlt object is given as 9 regardless of the actual length. For

[Rd] Methods not loaded in R-Devel vs 2.8.1

2009-01-30 Thread Pfaff, Bernhard Dr.
Dear list-member, I am currently developing a package with S4 classes. The NAMESPACE and DESCRIPTION is printed below. Within this package I have set a method residuals for two classes. In version 2.8.1 these two are reported whereas in R-Devel (2009-01-28 r47766). What have I missed? What has

Re: [Rd] Methods not loaded in R-Devel vs 2.8.1

2009-01-30 Thread Pfaff, Bernhard Dr.
Sorry for bothering the list one more time. When I run the code with RGui.exe the methods are shown in both versions of R and everything is fine. However, there is a difference whence the showMethods(residuals) is invoked via Rterm.exe. Here, neither under 2.8.1 nor R-Devel are the methods

Re: [Rd] Panel Data Unit Root tests

2009-01-30 Thread Achim Zeileis
Jose, this is not the list for asking questions like this. You should ask on R-help or (alternatively!) R-SIG-Finance would be a good place to ask. I could not find a package to run panel data unit root tests in R (there's a STATA module, though - PANELUNIT- and routines for Sarno and

Re: [Rd] (PR#13487) Segfault when mistakenly calling [.data.frame

2009-01-30 Thread Christian Brechbühler
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Prof Brian Ripley rip...@stats.ox.ac.ukwrote: What did your actual application do? This seems a very strange thing to do, and the segfault is in trying to construct the traceback. Only by using do.call on the object (and not even by name) do I get this

Re: [Rd] (PR#13487) Segfault when mistakenly calling [.data.frame

2009-01-30 Thread Tony Plate
Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:30 , Christian Brechbühler wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Prof Brian Ripley rip...@stats.ox.ac.ukwrote: What did your actual application do? This seems a very strange thing to do, and the segfault is in trying to construct the

Re: [Rd] In Rd: \describe \itemize and \item

2009-01-30 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 1/30/2009 2:22 PM, Nicholas L Crookston wrote: Duncan Murdoch murd...@stats.uwo.ca wrote on 01/29/2009 07:14:11 PM: On 29/01/2009 5:22 PM, Nicholas L Crookston wrote: I rebuilt a test version of my yaImpute package using Uwe Ligges' windows build service. I got this reply: Check

Re: [Rd] In Rd: \describe \itemize and \item

2009-01-30 Thread Nicholas L Crookston
Duncan Murdoch murd...@stats.uwo.ca wrote on 01/30/2009 12:04:56 PM: Okay, I think I see now. I installed your package version 1.0-8 in R-devel (to be 2.9.0), and the ?TallyLake man page looks fine to me in text mode, looks slightly funny in HTML (with the labels one line above the thing

Re: [Rd] Side-effects of require() vs library() on x86_64 aka amd64

2009-01-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 January 2009 at 22:26, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | RDieHarder fails its regression tests on x86_64 (aka amd64) at CRAN (using | Debian), and I see the same on Ubuntu 8.10 in 64 bit. No issues on 32bit. | | One odd thing is that the program behaves well if run via | | R --no-save