Jeff Ryan writes:
Hi Ross,
The quantmod package makes available routines from a variety of
contributed packages, but gets around your issues with a bit of, um,
trickery.
Take a look here (unless your name is Kurt ;-) ):
But Kurt will we happy to tell you that you can turn off forcing
How about using:
Enhances: Rmpi
?
b
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Ross Boylan r...@biostat.ucsf.edu wrote:
I have a package that can use rmpi, but works fine without it. None of
the automatic test code invokes rmpi functionality. (One test file
illustrates how to use it, but has quit()
On 14.01.2010 23:25, Ben Bolker wrote:
I think this is probably known by someone, but I wanted to ask/comment:
The 'adapt' package has been removed from CRAN because of an 'unclear'
license. That makes sense, but it actually took a bit of digging for me
to discover that, and if I had
The attached code produces corrupted pdfs (test2.pdf, test4.pdf and
test5.pdf). The resulting pdf depends on how many cores are available on
the machine.
I don't see why there should be any difference between the pdfs (exept for
the timestamp). Doing many operations involving mclapply can
On 1/15/10 12:19 AM, Kurt Hornik wrote:
Jeff Ryan writes:
Hi Ross,
The quantmod package makes available routines from a variety of
contributed packages, but gets around your issues with a bit of, um,
trickery.
Take a look here (unless your name is Kurt ;-) ):
I believe another option
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:22 , Seth Falcon wrote:
On 1/15/10 12:19 AM, Kurt Hornik wrote:
Jeff Ryan writes:
Hi Ross,
The quantmod package makes available routines from a variety of
contributed packages, but gets around your issues with a bit of, um,
trickery.
Take a look here (unless your
On 15.01.2010 16:22, Seth Falcon wrote:
On 1/15/10 12:19 AM, Kurt Hornik wrote:
Jeff Ryan writes:
Hi Ross,
The quantmod package makes available routines from a variety of
contributed packages, but gets around your issues with a bit of, um,
trickery.
Take a look here (unless your name is
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Seth Falcon wrote:
There is a real need (of some kind) here. Not all packages work on all
platforms. For example, the multicore package provides a mechanism for
running parallel computations on a multi-cpu box, but it is not
available on Windows. A package that _is_
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 09:19 +0100, Kurt Hornik wrote:
The idea is that maintainers typically want to
fully check their functionality, suggesting to force suggests by
default.
This might be the nub of the problem. There are different audiences,
even for R CMD check.
The maintainer probably
On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:18 , Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 09:19 +0100, Kurt Hornik wrote:
The idea is that maintainers typically want to
fully check their functionality, suggesting to force suggests by
default.
This might be the nub of the problem. There are different audiences,
How is this a bug in R? First, multicore is not R. Second, you're
running multicore with GUI code loaded which it explicitly tells you
that it won't work. Third, the code you provided does produce correct
PDFs (tested on the same platform you provided) in a clean session
(unsurprisingly).
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 10:48 +, Benilton Carvalho wrote:
How about using:
Enhances: Rmpi
?
b
The main reason is that enhances seems a peculiar way to describe the
relation between a package that (optionally) uses a piece of
infrastructure and the infrastructure. Similarly, I would
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 12:34 -0500, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:18 , Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 09:19 +0100, Kurt Hornik wrote:
The idea is that maintainers typically want to
fully check their functionality, suggesting to force suggests by
default.
This
Well I guess there's no point in starting a discussion here. I can also do all
calculations, gather the plots in a list before starting the pdf device and
plot them later. But just to prove my point: the attached pdfs (generated in a
clean session, on the system used to generate the bug report)
Here's an example (session info at the end).
tmpv - c('\265g/L','Bq/L')
order(tmpv)
[1] 2 1
tmpv - I(tmpv)
order(tmpv)
Error in if (xi xj) 1L else -1L : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
foov - gsub('\265','',tmpv)
order(foov)
[1] 2 1
str(tmpv)
Class 'AsIs' chr [1:2] \265g/L
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Don MacQueen wrote:
Here's an example (session info at the end).
tmpv - c('\265g/L','Bq/L')
order(tmpv)
[1] 2 1
tmpv - I(tmpv)
order(tmpv)
Error in if (xi xj) 1L else -1L : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
foov - gsub('\265','',tmpv)
order(foov)
[1] 2 1
16 matches
Mail list logo