Re: [Rd] Miktex does not work with R CMD check

2010-04-27 Thread Uwe Ligges
Ulrike, I just upgraded to the full MikTeX 2.8 distribution from today (still on 2.7 before) and checking my tuneR package worked fine. Hence Which package are you referring to? Best wishes, Uwe On 25.04.2010 18:57, Ulrike Grömping wrote: Dear DevelopeRs, the issue I am stuck with (I am

Re: [Rd] Miktex does not work with R CMD check

2010-04-27 Thread Ulrike Grömping
Uwe, I think it must be some problem on my computer, it happens for all my packages in R CMD check. I don't use TeX for anything else (if I can avoid it), therefore it might be something stupid that a regular TeX-user would never think about. However, it can't be a completely wrong setup of

Re: [Rd] serial connection patch

2010-04-27 Thread Matt Shotwell
Simon, Thanks for reviewing it! All the modified files are under the GPL version 2 (except the configure script). According to the GPLv2, I am granted permission to modify and redistribute the code as long as I make a notice in the files of their modification and the date (which I have not done

Re: [Rd] serial connection patch

2010-04-27 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 27/04/2010 8:32 AM, Matt Shotwell wrote: Simon, Thanks for reviewing it! All the modified files are under the GPL version 2 (except the configure script). According to the GPLv2, I am granted permission to modify and redistribute the code as long as I make a notice in the files of their

Re: [Rd] serial connection patch

2010-04-27 Thread Peter Dalgaard
On Apr 27, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 27/04/2010 8:32 AM, Matt Shotwell wrote: Simon, Thanks for reviewing it! All the modified files are under the GPL version 2 (except the configure script). According to the GPLv2, I am granted permission to modify and redistribute the

Re: [Rd] serial connection patch

2010-04-27 Thread Matt Shotwell
Oh, I just put that there for the bit about WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY :). I am satisfied with GPLv2 and have updated the license notice to reflect a change from GPLv3 to GPLv2 or later. -Matt On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 09:33 -0400, Peter Dalgaard wrote: On Apr 27, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

Re: [Rd] 00LOCK and nfs

2010-04-27 Thread Tony Plate
I have some tools and an R package that together provide a solution to the problem of updating an R package while it is attached in one or more running R sessions (whether on the same machine or not.) The technique is to always create a new directory for the newly installed package, so that

[Rd] Should mcnemar.test use as.factor instead of factor

2010-04-27 Thread Greg Snow
I am working with the mcnemar.test function and the help does not show a maintainer/author, but it is part of the stats package. My issue is that I want to use the test on 2 variables with possible values of 0:3, in one of the tests one of the variables does not have any 3's, so to make sure

[Rd] Consulta

2010-04-27 Thread Mariana Gomez
Estoy escribiendo una función en R para análisis de modelos lineales y tengo problemas al ejecutarla porque dicha función usa otra función, también creada por mi, y cuando ejecuto al primera me dice que no encuentra la segunda. Ambas funciones están guardadas en la carpeta work y al entrar al

[Rd] Unable to compile crc32_x86.S on windows (R-2.10.1).

2010-04-27 Thread Vaish Anjur
Thank you for any pointers. Windows XP ** *# as -version GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.19.1 Copyright 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or later. This program has absolutely no

[Rd] Resolving functions using R's namespace mechanism can double runtime

2010-04-27 Thread Dominick Samperi
It appears that the runtime for an R script can more than double if a few references to a function foo() are replaced by more explict references of the form pkgname::foo(). The more explicit references are of course required when two loaded packages define the same function. I can understand why

Re: [Rd] Resolving functions using R's namespace mechanism can double runtime

2010-04-27 Thread Seth Falcon
On 4/27/10 1:16 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote: It appears that the runtime for an R script can more than double if a few references to a function foo() are replaced by more explict references of the form pkgname::foo(). The more explicit references are of course required when two loaded packages

Re: [Rd] Resolving functions using R's namespace mechanism can double runtime

2010-04-27 Thread Romain Francois
Le 27/04/10 22:16, Dominick Samperi a écrit : It appears that the runtime for an R script can more than double if a few references to a function foo() are replaced by more explict references of the form pkgname::foo(). It would probably help your question if you provide some benchmarks. a::b

Re: [Rd] Consulta

2010-04-27 Thread Kjetil Halvorsen
Mariana: First, this post has nothing to do with future development of R, and so should be sent to R-help, not R-devel. Second, for questions in spanish you should consider the list R-help-es kjetil On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Mariana Gomez marianagomez1...@yahoo.com.ar wrote: Estoy

[Rd] Recent examples of calling R from .net managed code

2010-04-27 Thread rkanderson
Are there any recent examples of calling R from C#?. The examples that I have found are all using deprecated function. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Recent-examples-of-calling-R-from-net-managed-code-tp2068586p2068586.html Sent from the R devel mailing list