The 'extended' argument to 'strsplit'
has been removed, but it is still mentioned
in the argument items in the help file
for 'fixed' and 'perl'.
--
Patrick Burns
pbu...@pburns.seanet.com
twitter: @portfolioprobe
http://www.portfolioprobe.com/blog
http://www.burns-stat.com
(home of 'Some hints
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Marc Schwartz marc_schwa...@me.comwrote:
Also, I don't know what the typical response time has been on Bugzilla once
a bug report is filed. Perhaps something could be noted there so that bug
reporters might have some expectation that a comment/reply might be
On Dec 24, 2010, at 12:22 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Dec 23, 2010, at 8:24 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Dec 23, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
This message contains a good question:
Is there any reason why the bug reports are no longer mailed to R-devel?
The way Bugzilla works
On Dec 24, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Ken Williams wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Marc Schwartz marc_schwa...@me.com wrote:
Also, I don't know what the typical response time has been on Bugzilla once a
bug report is filed. Perhaps something could be noted there so that bug
reporters might
I do keep track of R's bug reports by RSS (Atom actually), but it's a
bit more complicated than just copying the `feed' link after following
the Show open bugs new-to-old link. If you use that feed, you will get
the earliest 100 entries, starting Jan 28, 2000. I have had good luck
monitoring the
On Dec 24, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Matt Shotwell wrote:
I do keep track of R's bug reports by RSS (Atom actually), but it's a
bit more complicated than just copying the `feed' link after following
the Show open bugs new-to-old link. If you use that feed, you will get
the earliest 100 entries,
On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 15:05 -0500, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Dec 24, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Matt Shotwell wrote:
I do keep track of R's bug reports by RSS (Atom actually), but it's a
bit more complicated than just copying the `feed' link after following
the Show open bugs new-to-old link. If you
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 8:59 AM, Luke Tierney l...@stat.uiowa.edu wrote:
Yes, attributes are not preserved, though why that should matter
given the frequent strong recommendations in this list against
using attributes on environments or other reference objects is
beyond me. More importantly,
