I've recently hunted down a troublesome bug in my own code, and am
looking for an easy mechanism to detect this kind of error in other R
code. The problem was an undefined variable inside of a function.
Unfortunately, R looked for that variable in the global environment
and found it since there
On 16/03/2011 4:14 PM, Ryan King wrote:
I've recently hunted down a troublesome bug in my own code, and am
looking for an easy mechanism to detect this kind of error in other R
code. The problem was an undefined variable inside of a function.
Unfortunately, R looked for that variable in the
On 16/03/2011 7:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hi,
I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
Windows):
The \usage entries for S3 methods should use the \method markup and not
their full name.
See the chapter 'Writing R documentation files' in manual 'Writing R
On 16/03/2011 7:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hi,
I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
Windows):
The \usage entries for S3 methods should use the \method markup and not
their full name.
See the chapter 'Writing R documentation files' in manual 'Writing R
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ryan King c.ryan.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I've recently hunted down a troublesome bug in my own code, and am
looking for an easy mechanism to detect this kind of error in other R
code. The problem was an undefined variable inside of a function.
Unfortunately, R
On Mar 16, 2011, at 23:29 , Gordon K Smyth wrote:
Hi Peter and others,
If it helps, I wrote a small function glm.scoretest() for the statmod package
on CRAN to compute score tests from glm fits. The score test for adding a
covariate, or any set of covariates, can be extracted very
Hi r-devels,
may I ask for an enhancement for download.packages()
to optionally resolve package dependencies similarly to
the respective functionality in install.packages() ?
This would be a major help in compiling a large number of
packages (e.g. by means of download.view() from pkg ctv)
for
On Mar 16, 2011, at 23:34 , John Maindonald wrote:
One can easily test for the binary case and not give the statistic in that
case.
Warning if expected cell counts 5 would be another possibility.
A general point is that if one gave no output that was not open to abuse,
there'd be
peter dalgaard pda...@gmail.com
on Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:45:01 +0100 writes:
On Mar 16, 2011, at 23:34 , John Maindonald wrote:
One can easily test for the binary case and not give the
statistic in that case.
Warning if expected cell counts 5 would be another
On Mar 17, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Dr. Peter Ruckdeschel wrote:
Hi r-devels,
may I ask for an enhancement for download.packages()
to optionally resolve package dependencies similarly to
the respective functionality in install.packages() ?
This would be a major help in compiling a large
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Duncan Murdoch
murdoch.dun...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/03/2011 7:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hi,
I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
Windows):
The \usage entries for S3 methods should use the \method markup and not
their
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Dan Tenenbaum dtene...@fhcrc.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Duncan Murdoch
murdoch.dun...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/03/2011 7:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hi,
I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
Windows):
The
On Mar 17, 2011, at 16:14 , Martin Maechler wrote:
peter dalgaard pda...@gmail.com
on Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:45:01 +0100 writes:
Back to the original question:
The current rstandard() code reads
## FIXME ! -- make sure we are following the literature:
rstandard.glm -
Dear Peter and Martin,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:08:18 +0100
peter dalgaard pda...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 17, 2011, at 16:14 , Martin Maechler wrote:
peter dalgaard pda...@gmail.com
on Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:45:01 +0100 writes:
Back to the original question:
The current
John Maindonald john.maindon...@anu.edu.au writes:
One can easily test for the binary case and not give the statistic in
that case.
A general point is that if one gave no output that was not open to
abuse, there'd be nothing given at all!
Thanks John. I've been reluctant to push too hard
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, peter dalgaard wrote:
On Mar 16, 2011, at 23:29 , Gordon K Smyth wrote:
Hi Peter and others,
If it helps, I wrote a small function glm.scoretest() for the statmod
package on CRAN to compute score tests from glm fits. The score test
for adding a covariate, or any set
On 11-03-17 12:33 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Duncan Murdoch
murdoch.dun...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/03/2011 7:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hi,
I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
Windows):
The \usage entries for S3 methods
Thanks! I found, say, exp(x) causes 2 duplications whereas sum(x) 0
duplication. Is there any document to learn from about this?
(first time list user. sorry if anything about the posting procedure is
wrong)
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Matt Shotwell m...@biostatmatt.com wrote:
On Wed,
18 matches
Mail list logo
