Dear all,
I've just had a package update bounced from CRAN because of a recent
change in R-devel which seems to affect the behaviour of the
initFields() reference class method. (The change must be very recent
because I tested the package on a week-old build of R-devel.) It seems
that the method
First off, this was an R-devel question (or maybe an r-sig-fedora
one).
It is not at all easy to give a complete answer: the list is very long
and changes rapidly as Fedora updates. If you can use yum to install
a minimal list and let it get the dependencies the list would be
manageable.
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 12:13 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
And the simplest way to get a minimal list would be to
look in the spec file for the Fedora SRPM.
See:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=R.git;a=blob_plain;f=R.spec;hb=HEAD
Pierre
On 5 Aug 2011, at 1:20AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
When you know the (fixed) structure of the data, the CRAN package mmap can be
a huge winner.
Thanks! I didn't know that.
Is there a package that provides methods for mmap, like sum(x) or maybe even
y=x+z
where x, and z are mmaps?
I assume
It's worth actually reading the list you post to ...
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Reference-classes-assignments-to-fields-td3708168.html
On Aug 5, 2011, at 6:41 AM, Jon Clayden wrote:
Dear all,
I've just had a package update bounced from CRAN because of a recent
change in R-devel which
Michael,
The mmap package currently provides an Ops method for comparisons, which
returns something like which(i==) does in R - since a vector of logicals the
same size would be likely too big to handle in many cases.
At some point I'll implement mmap to mmap operations, though for vectorized
There is also an item in the NEWS file:
Field assignments in reference classes are now consistent with
slots in S4 classes: the assigned value must come from the declared
class (if any) for the field or from a subclass.
On 8/5/11 7:24 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
It's worth actually reading
On Jul 19, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Jul 19, 2011, at 2:26 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Alireza Mahani wrote:
Simon,
Thank you for elaborating on the limitations of R in handling float types. I
think I'm pretty much there with you.
As for the
OK, apologies - on both fronts I obviously searched on the wrong
terms. Sorry to waste your time.
Jon
On 5 August 2011 18:22, John Chambers j...@r-project.org wrote:
There is also an item in the NEWS file:
Field assignments in reference classes are now consistent with slots in
S4
Hi
I want to use options() to store session wide options - is that a reasonable
approach, or should options() be reserved for core options?
Thanks
Rainer
--
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology,
UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)
Centre of Excellence for
10 matches
Mail list logo
