[Rd] rmpi vs snow - which one is better from communication overhead point of view

2012-01-04 Thread rdxcheena
Hi, I need to understand when is it best to use /rmpi/ and when is it best to use /snow/ for parallel programming in R? I understand snow can be used for a group of non-clustered work stations also. But I wish to understand from the point of view of using both on clusters for a problem which has

[Rd] [ping] fix type explanation in plot.default

2012-01-04 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
Dear R-devel, I sent this in December, but I didn't get any answer... The explanation of the 'type' parameter of plot.default is a bit confusing, plus the stray closing parenthesis. I suggest the following small change to match the one given in plot. Feel free to adjust at your convenience.

Re: [Rd] rmpi vs snow - which one is better from communication overhead point of view

2012-01-04 Thread Stephen Weston
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:57 AM, rdxcheena rdxche...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I need to understand when is it best to use /rmpi/ and when is it best to use /snow/ for parallel programming in R? I understand snow can be used for a group of non-clustered work stations also. But I wish to understand

[Rd] informal conventions/checklist for new predictive modeling packages

2012-01-04 Thread Max Kuhn
Working on the caret package has exposed me to the wide variety of approaches that different authors have taken to creating predictive modeling functions (aka machine learning)(aka pattern recognition). I suspect that many package authors are neophyte R users and are stumbling through the process

Re: [Rd] [ping] fix type explanation in plot.default

2012-01-04 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 04/01/2012 6:59 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: Dear R-devel, I sent this in December, but I didn't get any answer... The explanation of the 'type' parameter of plot.default is a bit confusing, plus the stray closing parenthesis. I suggest the following small change to match the one given in

Re: [Rd] returning information from functions via attributes rather than return list

2012-01-04 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Simon Urbanek simon.urba...@r-project.org wrote: Paul, On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: I would like to ask for advice from R experts about the benefits or dangers of using attr to return information with an object that is returned from a

Re: [Rd] returning information from functions via attributes rather than return list

2012-01-04 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 12-01-04 3:19 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Simon Urbanek simon.urba...@r-project.org wrote: Paul, On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: I would like to ask for advice from R experts about the benefits or dangers of using attr to return information

Re: [Rd] returning information from functions via attributes rather than return list

2012-01-04 Thread Hadley Wickham
Attributes are slightly harder to work with, so Simon's recommendation is good advice.  But in cases where you want other functions to work with the result, and the result isn't a named list with a class, then attributes are a convenient way to go. The only two snags I can think of are 1,