Hey all,
I've run accross what seems to be a bug in the recordPlot/replayPlot
functionality (or at least the lack of a feature which seems pretty
reasonable to expect to be there)
When drawing to a file-based graphics device (I tested with png()), the
file resulting from calling replayPlot on a r
Dear Duncan and Michael,
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-bounces@r-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Duncan Murdoch
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 9:51 AM
> To: Michael Friendly
> Cc: r-devel
> Subject: Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies
>
>
John Fox: (12:15PM on Fri, Sep 13)
[...cut...]
I think that most users --
as opposed to R developers -- will find the package::function( ... ) syntax
in examples not so much ugly as cryptic. I think that we have ample recent
evidence on this list that even developers (I don't exempt myself) are
c
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > It's not so much Rcpp itself or my 20-ish packages but the fact that we (as
| > in the Rcpp authors) now stand behind an API that also has to accomodate
| > changes in R CMD check. Case in point
On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 10:38, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13/09/2013 10:18 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 13 September 2013 at 09:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| > | Changes are generally announced in the NEWS.Rd file long before release,
| > | b
On 13 September 2013 at 10:38, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13/09/2013 10:18 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 13 September 2013 at 09:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| > | Changes are generally announced in the NEWS.Rd file long before release,
| > | but R-devel is an unreleased version, so you won't s
On 13.09.2013 16:44, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 13/09/2013 15:14, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13/09/2013 10:01 AM, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
I found a small issue while plotting contours of data containing both
"usual" and "very small" numbers. It appeared with both R 3.0.1 and
R
On 13/09/2013 10:37 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 13/09/2013 14:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 13/09/2013 8:31 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
>> On 9/12/2013 1:37 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> >
>> > I think this one would be fine if you had library(MASS) or
>> > require(MASS) or (probably best) us
On 13/09/2013 15:14, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13/09/2013 10:01 AM, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
I found a small issue while plotting contours of data containing both
"usual" and "very small" numbers. It appeared with both R 3.0.1 and
R-Devel on Windows, and I could reproduce it on
On 13/09/2013 10:18 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 09:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| Changes are generally announced in the NEWS.Rd file long before release,
| but R-devel is an unreleased version, so you won't see the news until it
| is there. Announcing things that nobody ca
On 13/09/2013 14:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13/09/2013 8:31 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
On 9/12/2013 1:37 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> I think this one would be fine if you had library(MASS) or
> require(MASS) or (probably best) used MASS::loglm explicitly. It may
> be that in the past some
On 13 September 2013 at 09:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| Changes are generally announced in the NEWS.Rd file long before release,
| but R-devel is an unreleased version, so you won't see the news until it
| is there. Announcing things that nobody can try leads to fewer useful
| comments than put
On 13/09/2013 10:01 AM, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
I found a small issue while plotting contours of data containing both
"usual" and "very small" numbers. It appeared with both R 3.0.1 and
R-Devel on Windows, and I could reproduce it on Linux. Would it be
possible to solve this be
On 13 September 2013 at 08:31, Michael Friendly wrote:
| Thanks for this explanation, but I'm still confused about how to avoid
| the wrath of the CRAN-devel daemon, whose appetite for new morsels of
| developer flesh seems ever increasing and makes keeping even a stable
| package up-to-date a mo
Dear R developers,
I found a small issue while plotting contours of data containing both
"usual" and "very small" numbers. It appeared with both R 3.0.1 and
R-Devel on Windows, and I could reproduce it on Linux. Would it be
possible to solve this before the upcoming release?
Thanks a lot for dev
On 13/09/2013 8:31 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
On 9/12/2013 1:37 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> I think this one would be fine if you had library(MASS) or
> require(MASS) or (probably best) used MASS::loglm explicitly. It may
> be that in the past some other package put MASS on the search list,
>
This seems to be nothing to do with R-devel, which has none of those
classes.
Note that the versions of lme4 currently offered by CRAN for R 3.0.1 and
R-devel are different. I expect that is the root of the confusion,
although as far as I know the one with class "merMod" is the one for
R-dev
On 9/12/2013 1:37 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I think this one would be fine if you had library(MASS) or
require(MASS) or (probably best) used MASS::loglm explicitly. It may
be that in the past some other package put MASS on the search list,
and that's why it worked before.
The distinction i
On Sep 13, 2013, at 7:44, alku wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The R CMD check is successful in R 3.0.1 but fails to install package
> lmerTest under R-devel r63910,
> Here is what I get:
>
> ** preparing package for lazy loading
> Error in reconcilePropertiesAndPrototype(name, slots, prototype,
> superCla
Hi,
The R CMD check is successful in R 3.0.1 but fails to install package
lmerTest under R-devel r63910,
Here is what I get:
** preparing package for lazy loading
Error in reconcilePropertiesAndPrototype(name, slots, prototype,
superClasses, :
no definition was found for superclass "merMod"
20 matches
Mail list logo
