With regards to abstraction - I would personally much rather read and write
code that contained plotScores() and plotScree() etc. where the intend of the
code is clearly communicated, instead of relying on a plot() function whose
result is only known from experience. Trying to squeeze every
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Thomas Lin Pedersen
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
With regards to abstraction - I would personally much rather read and write
code that contained plotScores() and plotScree() etc. where the intend of the
code is clearly communicated, instead of relying on a
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 17:18 -0400, Michael Friendly wrote:
On 10/30/2014 4:19 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
Did you intend rgl to be optional? If so, then you should use
Suggests: instead. When you use Imports: it will load rgl
automatically so require() does't make sense (since it will be always
When checking a package (call it A) that has Enhances: B in DESCRIPTION, I
get the message:
Package which this enhances but not available for checking: ‘B’
Can this be changed to:
Package which enhances this but not available for checking: ‘B’
?
Because really, B is not enhanced by A, B does
Is it expected that attributes set on a LGLSXP created by
ScalarLogical will apply to all future objects created by
ScalarLogical as well? For example: the 'test1' function below returns
FALSE and 'test2' returns FALSE with an attribute:
library(inline)
test1 - cfunction(body = 'return
On 31/10/2014, 2:22 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
When checking a package (call it A) that has Enhances: B in DESCRIPTION,
I get the message:
Package which this enhances but not available for checking: ‘B’
Can this be changed to:
Package which enhances this but not available for checking:
Dear All,
I am trying to do the following, and could use some hints.
Suppose I have a package called pkgA. pkgA exposes an API that
includes setting some options, e.g. pkgA works with color palettes,
and the user of the package can define new palettes. pkgA provides an
API to manipulate these
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Gábor Csárdi csardi.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
I am trying to do the following, and could use some hints.
Suppose I have a package called pkgA. pkgA exposes an API that
includes setting some options, e.g. pkgA works with color palettes,
and the user of
You can put the following 3 objects, an environment and 2 functions
that access it, in any package that need some package-specific
storage (say your pkgB1 and pkgB2).
.pkgLocalStorage - new.env(parent = emptyenv())
assignInPkgLocalStorage - function(name, object) {
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:16 PM, William Dunlap wdun...@tibco.com wrote:
You can put the following 3 objects, an environment and 2 functions
that access it, in any package that need some package-specific
storage (say your pkgB1 and pkgB2).
.pkgLocalStorage - new.env(parent = emptyenv())
I'm developing packages that in some places use code that started off as a
direct copy-paste from the R sources (this is C code). The finished code is
fairly different from what I started with, but clearly uses similar algorithms
/ tricks as the original code, and some lines here and there are
Mike,
Perhaps this will help: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-04/msg00346.html
Regards,
Ed Davignon
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Mike Beddo mike.be...@dataventures.com
wrote:
Greetings,
When I try install.packages('Rcpp') it fails when compiling api.cpp
(line 39). This is Rcpp
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Gábor Csárdi csardi.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Gabor Grothendieck
ggrothendi...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Is there a better way? I have a feeling that this is already supported
somehow, I just can't find out how.
Try the settings
On 10/31/2014 05:55 PM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:16 PM, William Dunlap wdun...@tibco.com wrote:
You can put the following 3 objects, an environment and 2 functions
that access it, in any package that need some package-specific
storage (say your pkgB1 and pkgB2).
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Gabor Grothendieck
ggrothendi...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Isn't your problem really just that you want multiple sets of
settings? That's what settings provides.
Almost. Multiple sets of settings, set up by the same package. So
essentially I want pkgA to use
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Martin Morgan mtmor...@fredhutch.org wrote:
[...]
You'll need pkgA to be able to know that pkgB1's invokation is to use
pkgB1's parameters, so coupling state (parameters) with function, i.e., a
class with methods. So a solution is to use an S4 or reference class
On 30 October 2014 at 04:13, Mike Beddo wrote:
| Greetings,
|
| When I try install.packages('Rcpp') it fails when compiling api.cpp (line
39). This is Rcpp 0.11.3. I searched my filesystem, and indeed I do not have
execinfo.h anywhere. After some effort, I got R build on AIX. Now I am trying
Dirk and Edward,
Thanks for the help.
I found for AIX that execinfo.h basically did nothing that I could tell. What
I ended up doing was replacing the line in api.cpp #include execinfo.h with
the following from gnulib:
int backtrace (void **buffer, int size)
{
(void) buffer;
(void)
18 matches
Mail list logo
