Oops, such an amateur mistake. Thanks a lot for your quick response.
Regards
TP
On 03/05/2015 06:49 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 05/03/2015 14:55, Tadeáš Palusga wrote:
Hi,
I'm using this mailing list for the first time and I hope this is the
right one. I don't think that the following
See weightedMean() in the matrixStats package. It's optimized for
data type, speed and memory and implemented in native code so it can
avoid some of these intermediate copies. It's a few times faster than
weighted.mean[.default]();
library(matrixStats)
library(microbenchmark)
n - 5000
x -
On 05/03/2015 6:03 PM, Etienne Lord wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to submit my first package which depends on doParallel:
Depends: R (= 3.0), igraph, doParallel
It's much better to import what you need. If someone calls one of your
functions using :: notation, it will fail, because it won't know
On 05/03/2015 6:16 PM, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 18:03 -0500, Etienne Lord wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to submit my first package which depends on doParallel:
Depends: R (= 3.0), igraph, doParallel
add foreach to your Depends. That should resolve the error you're
seeing.
On 05/03/2015 14:55, Tadeáš Palusga wrote:
Hi,
I'm using this mailing list for the first time and I hope this is the
right one. I don't think that the following is a bug but it can be a
performance issue.
By my opinion, there is no need to filter by [w != 0] in last sum of
Hi,
I'm using this mailing list for the first time and I hope this is the
right one. I don't think that the following is a bug but it can be a
performance issue.
By my opinion, there is no need to filter by [w != 0] in last sum of
weighted.mean.default method defined in
Hi, Hervé,
Hi, Bioc-devel folks,
Is there an accepted way to migrate a package from CRAN to BioC?
CRAN's policy says, The package�s license must give the right for
CRAN to distribute the package in perpetuity
Is it enough to request that CRAN archive the package, then submit it
as a
