Re: [Bioc-devel] "single cell" BiocViews

2016-09-20 Thread Aaron Lun
Hear hear. - Original Message - From: "Michael Love" To: "Martin Morgan" Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org Sent: Tuesday, 20 September, 2016 10:11:10 PM Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] "single cell" BiocViews That looks right to me, as

[Bioc-devel] github mirror and svn out of sync

2016-09-20 Thread Rainer Johannes
Dear all, I recently observed that the svn and the github mirror of `ensembldb` is out of sync. Is this something specific to `ensembldb` or is this a general problem? Is there anything I could do to fix this? thanks, jo ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org

[Rd] Undocumented 'use.names' argument to c()

2016-09-20 Thread Karl Millar via R-devel
'c' has an undocumented 'use.names' argument. I'm not sure if this is a documentation or implementation bug. > c(a = 1) a 1 > c(a = 1, use.names = F) [1] 1 Karl __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Handlers in setGraphicsEventHandlers() can recursively call getGraphicsEvent(). Intended behavior?

2016-09-20 Thread Paul Murrell
Hi Is the correct patch to remove the setting of the gettingEvent flag or would it be better to flip the TRUE/FALSE setting (set to TRUE before handling then reset to FALSE after handling) ? Also, for this patch and for the other two you sent, one difficulty will be with testing the

Re: [Bioc-devel] "single cell" BiocViews

2016-09-20 Thread Michael Love
That looks right to me, as it spans across transcription, etc. There are so many great single cell methods now on Bioconductor. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list

Re: [Bioc-devel] "single cell" BiocViews

2016-09-20 Thread Martin Morgan
On 09/20/2016 04:26 PM, Michael Love wrote: It would be useful to have a "single cell" BiocViews I guess the full suggestion is Software --> Technology --> SingleCell ? Martin -Mike [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___

[Bioc-devel] "single cell" BiocViews

2016-09-20 Thread Michael Love
It would be useful to have a "single cell" BiocViews -Mike [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Re: [Rd] Numerical accuracy of matrix multiplication

2016-09-20 Thread Alexis Sarda
I just realized that I was actually using a different random number generator, could that be a valid reason for the discrepancy? The code should be: RNGkind("L'Ecuyer") set.seed(883) x <- rnorm(100) x %*% x - sum(x^2) # equal to 1.421085e-14 Regards, Alexis Sarda. On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at

Re: [Rd] Numerical accuracy of matrix multiplication

2016-09-20 Thread Martin Maechler
> Alexis Sarda > on Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:33:49 +0200 writes: > I just realized that I was actually using a different random number > generator, could that be a valid reason for the discrepancy? > The code should be: > RNGkind("L'Ecuyer") >

Re: [Rd] Numerical accuracy of matrix multiplication

2016-09-20 Thread Martin Maechler
> peter dalgaard > on Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:33:11 +0200 writes: > On 16 Sep 2016, at 12:41 , Alexis Sarda wrote: >> Hello, >> >> while testing the crossprod() function under Linux, I noticed the following: >> >>