Dear all,
Apologies for the confusing email below, but I'm not sure anymore which
information can save the day. I'll provide all the information necessary to
fix the situation!
I think I've turned my GitHub/svn/GitHub-mirror repositories into a huge
plate of spaghetti after encountering
> Dirk Eddelbuettel
> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes:
> On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote: | My
> proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if |
> somebody has a more concise or better "English style"
> wording |
> Brian G Peterson
> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:37:18 -0500 writes:
> On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 16:24 +0100, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> > Jan Gorecki > on Fri, 4
>> Nov 2016 11:20:37 + writes:
>>
>> > Martin, I
On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote:
| My proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if
| somebody has a more concise or better "English style" wording
| (which is somewhat compatible with all the other options you see
| from 'R CMD check --help'),
| please speak up.
> Jan Gorecki
> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:20:37 + writes:
> Martin, I submitted very simple patch on
> https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17176
> Herve, While I like your idea, I prefer to keep my patch
> simple, it is now
Thanks from my side as well!
Rampal
On 1-11-2016 21:53, Henric Winell wrote:
> Den 2016-11-01 kl. 21:24, skrev Duncan Murdoch:
>> On 01/11/2016 9:49 AM, Rampal Etienne wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> When I try to build a Windows binary in RStudio using R-devel,
>>> everything goes well until the
Martin,
I submitted very simple patch on
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17176
Herve,
While I like your idea, I prefer to keep my patch simple, it is now
exactly what Martin mentions. I think it is a good start that can
eventually be extended later for what you are asking.