The site is working again, although for some reason it did not
download any vignettes. I think that is OK.
On 12/21/16 18:22, Jonathan Baron wrote:
Unfortunately, I am unable to get this search site working again. (The
message below explains why I had to rebuild it.)
--
Jonathan Baron,
On 22 December 2016 at 14:15, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 22/12/2016 1:55 PM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
| > All,
| > My package was not initially built with the rcpp use in mind. I have to
include C++ source code for a particular project so I will have edit the
description file add src files, etc.
A mistake that I have made repeatedly is forgetting to add an
appropriate UseDynLib() call to the NAMESPACE file.
On 16-12-22 02:15 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 22/12/2016 1:55 PM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
>> All,
>> My package was not initially built with the rcpp use in mind. I have
>> to
On 22/12/2016 1:55 PM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
All,
My package was not initially built with the rcpp use in mind. I have to
include C++ source code for a particular project so I will have edit the
description file add src files, etc. by hand. I an going over the rcpp
documentation now and
All,
My package was not initially built with the rcpp use in mind. I have to
include C++ source code for a particular project so I will have edit the
description file add src files, etc. by hand. I an going over the rcpp
documentation now and reviewing the R documentation on extensions as
Problem solved:
1. I installed the fftw library dlls from http://www.fftw.org/
2. I told the package where to find this library in the makevars.win file.
Regards,
Rampal
On 22-Dec-16 11:28, Rampal Etienne wrote:
> When trying to build a package with RStudio (newest R-devel and Rtools
>
> Florent Angly
> on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:42:37 +0100 writes:
> Hi all,
> I believe there is an issue with passing NULL to the function I().
> class(NULL) # "NULL" (as expected)
> print(NULL) # NULL (as expected)
> is.null(NULL) #
I have read both the historical r-devel threads and the most recent one
regarding this. After reviewing the code, it would seem to beg for a
linked-list implementation vs. an array implementation.
This has several interesting consequences.
Cons:
1) We pay for dynamic allocation every time we