There are also weekly "long test" builds with a 6h timeout:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2017-November/012326.html
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
are you sure his tmp directory isn't full
--t
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 3:25 PM Leonardo Collado Torres
wrote:
> From Richard:
>
> > BiocManager::install("DelayedArray")
>
> Bioconductor version 3.7 (BiocManager 1.30.1), R 3.5.0 (2018-04-23)
>
> Installing package(s) 'BiocVersion',
BiocManager::install(whatever) doesn't work?
biocLite is supposed to die, you see...
--t
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 2:45 PM Leonardo Collado Torres
wrote:
> Hi bioc-devel,
>
> A co-worker of mine (Richard) tried several times to install the
> DelayedArray package. We got a couple of errors but
Dear R Developers,
I would like to propose a simple optimization for print.data.frame
base function:
To add: x <- as.data.frame(head(x, n = options("max.print")))
This would prevent that, if for example, we have a 10GB data.frame
(e.g.: Instead of a data.table), and we accidentally print it,
Hi bioc-devel,
A co-worker of mine (Richard) tried several times to install the
DelayedArray package. We got a couple of errors but it ultimately
looks like it's an internet connection problem. The truth is that
might be something affecting us on our side since I can't access
In looking at rootfinding for the histoRicalg project (see
gitlab.com/nashjc/histoRicalg),
I thought I would check how uniroot() solves some problems. The following short
example
ff <- function(x){ exp(0.5*x) - 2 }
ff(2)
ff(1)
uniroot(ff, 0, 10)
uniroot(ff, c(0, 10), trace=1)
uniroot(ff, c(0,
Hi,
I have run into a problem with parseData from the utils package. When
an assignment is done with = instead of <-, the information provided by
parseData does not include an entry for the assignment.
For this input, stored in file "BadPosition.R":
y <- 5
foo = 7
And running this code:
On 30 July 2018 at 16:26, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
| Thanks for the tip. That could be a huge timesaver. But it lists only a
| single package for versions 0.90.1-2 ... how does that work?
The lookip is source or binary-package based. Eg here are three binaries
built from source 'r-base':
Thanks for the tip. That could be a huge timesaver. But it lists only a
single package for versions 0.90.1-2 ... how does that work?
David
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 12:27, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 30 July 2018 at 05:35, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> | Hi guys,
> |
> | Perhaps someone here can
Interesting discussion. I'm not wholly convinced by Martin's and Emil's
arguments. The behaviour seems to violate an obvious expectation (fun is
called once per row) to satisfy a subtle one (result has a guaranteed
dimension and type).
In any case, here's a suggested chunk of rd to go at the end
Typo, I mean
1.7.1
> On Jul 30, 2018, at 10:38 AM, ni41435_ca
> wrote:
>
> Hi Shana,
>
> It seems that this occurred because of a merge gone bad and then followed by
> a series of version changes which are wrong.
>
> I’ll just fix your version number to (1.7.2) for now and it’s your
>
Hi Shana,
It seems that this occurred because of a merge gone bad and then followed by a
series of version changes which are wrong.
I’ll just fix your version number to (1.7.2) for now and it’s your
responsibility to sync again with your Github.
Best,
Nitesh
> On Jul 30, 2018, at 5:51
Try pmap and related functions in purrr:
pmap(as.data.frame(m), ~ { cat("Called...\n"); print(c(...)) })
## list()
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:33 AM, David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been asked many times before, but I couldn't find
> anything on the mailing lists.
>
> I'd
Hi David,
Besides Martins point, there is also the issue that for a lot of cases you
would still like to have the right class returned.
Right now these are returns:
> apply(matrix(NA_integer_,0,5), 1, class)
character(0)
> apply(matrix(NA_integer_,0,5), 1,
> David Hugh-Jones
> on Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:12:24 +0100 writes:
> Hi Martin, Fair enough for R functions in general. But the
> behaviour of apply violates the expectation that apply(m,
> 1, fun) calls fun n times when m has n rows. That seems
> pretty basic.
Well,
On 30 July 2018 at 05:35, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
| Hi guys,
|
| Perhaps someone here can help.
|
| I am trying to build versions of R 1 for the rcheology package (just
| arrived on CRAN).
|
| For R prior to 1.5.0, I cannot configure support for tcl-tk.
|
| I am building on Debian Woody
Hi Shana,
Sorry for the delay in replying - I've been on vacation. I tested this
with one of my own packages and found the same problem. I'm not sure how
you managed to commit the lower version number in the first place (I'm not
going to test that since I'll get stuck too!) but I guess the
Hi Martin,
Fair enough for R functions in general. But the behaviour of apply violates
the expectation that apply(m, 1, fun) calls fun n times when m has n rows.
That seems pretty basic.
Also, I understand from your argument why it makes sense to call apply and
return a special result
> David Hugh-Jones
> on Mon, 30 Jul 2018 05:33:19 +0100 writes:
> Forgive me if this has been asked many times before, but I
> couldn't find anything on the mailing lists.
> I'd expect apply(m, 1, foo) not to call `foo` if m is a
> matrix with zero rows. In fact:
> William Dunlap via R-devel
> on Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:06:40 -0700 writes:
> Bugzilla issue 16101 describes another
> first-list-name-printed-differently oddity with
> the Windows GUI version of R:
Indeed:
1)
OK,
I submitted the package via the webform with "rth" as a role for Diane. It
failed the automatic testing for two notes and was archived within a few
minutes. One note indicated the package was a new submission, while the other
was related to my use of "rth". I responded to all and
21 matches
Mail list logo
