[Bioc-devel] merge the release and the dev version to eliminate errors

Hi, I am trying to fix the package on new dev 3.9. The errors appears to be different from what it is in the release version 3.8. The errors in 3.9 is in window system, while the errors in 3.8 are in the other two systems. Is there a way I can merge these two?

[Bioc-devel] Bioc 3.9 software builds Nov 23

The Linux builder for Bioc 3.9 was taking an unusually long time to complete the software builds today. Because of this, today's report will only include Windows and Mac results. Valerie This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the

[Bioc-devel] build/check report for experimental data not updating

Hi all, I noticed that the check report for experimental data (Bioc3.9) is not updating. The snapshot date is still "Sun, 18 Nov 2018". Thanks, Carmen -- Carmen Maria Livi Post Doctoral Researcher Ferrari Lab IFOM - Fondazione Istituto firc Oncologia Molecolare Via Adamello 16 20139 Milano,

Re: [Rd] [tryExcept] New try Function

Hi Emil, First, thanks for the response. As you mentioned, a lot of times tryCatch does the work, as you can return a value. However, sometimes it is useful to assign several variables when an error occurs. You could do it with <<-, but I prefer to reduce it's usage unless completely necessary.

[Rd] R 3.5.2 scheduled for December 20

Full schedule available on developer.r-project.org -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com

Re: [Rd] [tryExcept] New try Function

Hi Ernest, To start: I don't see an attachment, I think they're not (always) allowed on this mailing-list. If you want to send something, text is your safest bet. But regarding the issue of tryCatch: I think you're not fully using what it already can do. In almost all circumstances I've