[Bioc-devel] duplicate commits for nucleoSim

2019-04-10 Thread Astrid Deschenes
Hi, ​ The nucleoSim package has duplicate commits dating from long time (older than October 2016).​ ​ I have checked the package by doing a fresh clone directly from Bioconductor and those duplicate commits seem to be present there.​ ​ Can you confirm that it is the case and if so, provide

Re: [Rd] Parsing code with newlines

2019-04-10 Thread Mikhail Titov
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 5:06 AM, Tomas Kalibera wrote: >> This is my first post here. I came across the very same problem. >> It can be reproduced within modified tests/Embedding/RParseEval.c > > Please check https://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html and update > your post if you still need

[Bioc-devel] PoTRA building Man PDF

2019-04-10 Thread margaret linan
Hi - During the last build, the man page received some warnings, I’m not sure what I am doing wrong. The items are nestled within the argument tag and the curly braces are in place. Found the following significant warnings: Warning: /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.9-bioc/meat/PoTRA/man/potra_man.Rd:25:

Re: [Bioc-devel] Packages with broken unit tests because of sample() change in R 3.6

2019-04-10 Thread Leonardo Collado Torres
Thanks Hervé, I also found this tweet by John Muschelli useful for this situation https://twitter.com/StrictlyStat/status/1103303028751372289 where he suggests using suppressWarnings(RNGversion("3.5.0")) That's what I did for example in

Re: [Rd] R 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 alpha Windows bug: UTF-8 characters in code are simplified to wrong ones

2019-04-10 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 10/04/2019 12:32 p.m., Jeroen Ooms wrote: On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 5:45 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 10/04/2019 10:29 a.m., Yihui Xie wrote: Since it is "technically easy" to disable the best fit conversion and the best fit is rarely good, how about providing an option for code/package

Re: [Rd] R 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 alpha Windows bug: UTF-8 characters in code are simplified to wrong ones

2019-04-10 Thread Jeroen Ooms
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 5:45 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > On 10/04/2019 10:29 a.m., Yihui Xie wrote: > > Since it is "technically easy" to disable the best fit conversion and > > the best fit is rarely good, how about providing an option for > > code/package authors to disable it? I'm asking

Re: [Rd] R 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 alpha Windows bug: UTF-8 characters in code are simplified to wrong ones

2019-04-10 Thread Tomáš Bořil
Yes, again in a script sourced by source(encoding = ...). But also by typing it directly in R console. Most of the time, I use RStudio as a front-end. For this experiment, I also verified it in Rgui. In both front-ends, it behaves completely in the same way. An optional parameter to source()

Re: [Rd] R 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 alpha Windows bug: UTF-8 characters in code are simplified to wrong ones

2019-04-10 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 10/04/2019 10:29 a.m., Yihui Xie wrote: Since it is "technically easy" to disable the best fit conversion and the best fit is rarely good, how about providing an option for code/package authors to disable it? I'm asking because this is one of the most painful issues in packages that may need

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Check Flavor r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang charset

2019-04-10 Thread Gábor Csárdi
If the charset choice is intentional, then we can add a builder/docker image for this on R-hub. It would certainly make sense to have a builder with an unusual charset. Gabor On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:43 AM David Gohel wrote: > > Dear all, > > Among the CRAN machines used by Check,

Re: [Rd] R 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 alpha Windows bug: UTF-8 characters in code are simplified to wrong ones

2019-04-10 Thread Yihui Xie
Since it is "technically easy" to disable the best fit conversion and the best fit is rarely good, how about providing an option for code/package authors to disable it? I'm asking because this is one of the most painful issues in packages that may need to source() code containing UTF-8 characters

Re: [Rd] R 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 alpha Windows bug: UTF-8 characters in code are simplified to wrong ones

2019-04-10 Thread Tomas Kalibera
On 4/10/19 1:14 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:19 PM Tomáš Bořil wrote: Minimalistic example: Let's type "ř" (LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH CARON) in RGui console: "ř" [1] "r" Although the script is in UTF-8, the characters are replaced by "simplified" substitutes

Re: [Rd] R 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 alpha Windows bug: UTF-8 characters in code are simplified to wrong ones

2019-04-10 Thread Jeroen Ooms
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:19 PM Tomáš Bořil wrote: > > Minimalistic example: > Let's type "ř" (LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH CARON) in RGui console: > > "ř" > [1] "r" > > Although the script is in UTF-8, the characters are replaced by > "simplified" substitutes uncontrollably (depending on OS

Re: [Rd] R 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 alpha Windows bug: UTF-8 characters in code are simplified to wrong ones

2019-04-10 Thread Tomas Kalibera
On 4/10/19 10:22 AM, Tomáš Bořil wrote: > Hello, > > There is a long-lasting problem with processing UTF-8 source code in R > on Windows OS. As Windows do not have "UTF-8" locale and R passes > source code through OS before executing it, some characters are > "simplified" by the OS before

[R-pkg-devel] Check Flavor r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang charset

2019-04-10 Thread David Gohel
Dear all, Among the CRAN machines used by Check, "r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang" has been upgraded from UTF-8 to ISO8859-15. # using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-07 r76333) # using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) # using session charset: ISO8859-15 I realized that while

[Rd] R 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 alpha Windows bug: UTF-8 characters in code are simplified to wrong ones

2019-04-10 Thread Tomáš Bořil
Hello, There is a long-lasting problem with processing UTF-8 source code in R on Windows OS. As Windows do not have "UTF-8" locale and R passes source code through OS before executing it, some characters are "simplified" by the OS before processing, leading to undesirable changes. Minimalistic

Re: [Rd] Parsing code with newlines

2019-04-10 Thread Tomas Kalibera
On 4/5/19 8:14 AM, Mikhail Titov wrote: Hello! This is my first post here. I came across the very same problem. It can be reproduced within modified tests/Embedding/RParseEval.c Please check https://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html and update your post if you still need to get help here