Re: [Rd] Inno Setup 6.0.2 fails before creating exe file on Windows (R-3.6.0)

2019-05-01 Thread Jeroen Ooms
Multiple people have now reported that the R installer does not build with InnoSetup 6 (released last week). The inno log shows this error: Error on line 12 in src\gnuwin32\installer\R.iss: Minimum NT version specified by MinVersion must be at least 6.0. (Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003 are no longe

Re: [Rd] [External] Re: Background R session on Unix and SIGINT

2019-05-01 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 4:20 PM Simon Urbanek wrote: > I think you're talking about two independent things. You can interrupt the > computation, no question about that. It's just that if you send an interrupt > while you're *not* doing any computations, it will be signaled but not raised > until

Re: [Rd] [External] Re: Background R session on Unix and SIGINT

2019-05-01 Thread Simon Urbanek
Gabor, I think you're talking about two independent things. You can interrupt the computation, no question about that. It's just that if you send an interrupt while you're *not* doing any computations, it will be signaled but not raised until the interrupts are checked since there is no one to

[Rd] anyNA() performance on vectors of POSIXct

2019-05-01 Thread Harvey Smith
Inside of the anyNA() function, it will use the legacy any(is.na()) code if x is an OBJECT(). If x is a vector of POSIXct, it will be an OBJECT(), but it is also TYPEOF(x) == REALSXP. Therefore, it will skip the faster ITERATE_BY_REGION, which is typically 5x faster in my testing. Is the OBJECT(