Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Hi, Henrik Singmann et al.:   Thanks for the suggestions.  I tried again to pull "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat; from R-Forge, with the same "Error 500" as before.  Then I tried pulling from "https://github.com/rforge/ecdat;, which seemed to work ... AND the copy I pulled was at

Re: [Bioc-devel] Biconductor Git Credentials

Please activate and update your account. I have made the needed fix. Best, Nitesh On 6/27/19, 7:16 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Federico, Anthony, Nicholas" wrote: an...@bu.edu This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the

[Bioc-devel] Biconductor Git Credentials

Dear Thread, I’m trying to activate my Bioconductor account here: https://git.bioconductor.org/BiocCredentials/account_activation/ I’m getting the following error: "an...@bu.edu is not associated with a maintainer of a Bioconductor package. Please check the spelling or

Re: [Rd] methods package: A _R_CHECK_LENGTH_1_LOGIC2_=true error

Using: untrace(methods::conformMethod) at <- c(12,4,3,2) str(body(methods::conformMethod)[[at]]) ## language omittedSig <- omittedSig && (signature[omittedSig] != "missing") cc <- 0L trace(methods::conformMethod, tracer = quote({ cc <<- cc + 1L print(cc) if (cc == 31) { ## manually

Re: [R-pkg-devel] pandoc version used in winbuilder

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:36 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote: > I don't see Solaris builds there -- as far as I know that's the flavour > of CRAN machine that's missing it. rgl gets a warning about CRAN being > unable to build the vignettes because of that. > I am not sure if pandoc supports Solaris,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] pandoc version used in winbuilder

On 27/06/2019 10:33 a.m., Gábor Csárdi wrote: On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:52 PM Duncan Murdoch > wrote: [...] It takes work to install a new version, and presumably nobody has done that work.  Pandoc is not easy to build, so some CRAN machines don't

Re: [Rd] methods package: A _R_CHECK_LENGTH_1_LOGIC2_=true error

> peter dalgaard > on Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:23:14 +0200 writes: > Henrik, > If a minimal reprex is hard to construct, could you perhaps instrument your version of R to include a browser() call at the start of the > else if(!all(signature[omittedSig] == "missing")) {

Re: [R-pkg-devel] pandoc version used in winbuilder

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:52 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote: [...] > > It takes work to install a new version, and presumably nobody has done > that work. Pandoc is not easy to build, so some CRAN machines don't > have it at all. > Pandoc is indeed not easy to build. Luckily, we don't have to build

Re: [Rd] methods package: A _R_CHECK_LENGTH_1_LOGIC2_=true error

Henrik, If a minimal reprex is hard to construct, could you perhaps instrument your version of R to include a browser() call at the start of the else if(!all(signature[omittedSig] == "missing")) { branch, run the code that triggers the issue for you (and must hit that branch) and tell us

Re: [Rd] Seg fault stats::runmed

> Martin Maechler > on Fri, 5 Oct 2018 12:16:37 +0200 writes: > Hilmar Berger > on Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:17:49 +0200 writes: >> Dear all, I just found this issue: >> I just found this issue: >> dd1 = c(rep(NaN,82), rep(-1, 144), rep(1, 74)) >> xx =

Re: [R-pkg-devel] pandoc version used in winbuilder

On 27/06/2019 9:51 a.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 26/06/2019 2:54 p.m., Lenth, Russell V wrote: All, How does one tell what version of pandoc is being used by winbuilder (and probably other related CRAN-submission processes)? The function rmarkdown::pandoc_version() will tell you. I have

Re: [R-pkg-devel] pandoc version used in winbuilder

On 26/06/2019 2:54 p.m., Lenth, Russell V wrote: All, How does one tell what version of pandoc is being used by winbuilder (and probably other related CRAN-submission processes)? The function rmarkdown::pandoc_version() will tell you. I have a package with several HTML vignettes, for which

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

� Thanks.� I'm still having problems: ��� ��� 1.� I went to "github.com" and logged in with my standard GitHub account ��� ��� 2.� Then I clicked "+" in the upper right, just left of my GitHub ID icon, and selected "Import a repository", as Lionel suggested. ��� ��� 3.�

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

  Thanks to Duncan, Lionel and Henrik for their quick replies. I have further questions:        1.  Will GitHub automatically transfer the commits I made to R-Forge in the past couple of days?  R-Forge is now at Rev. 420, and GitHub is still at 418.  Will 419 and 420 be

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

On 26/06/2019 1:38 p.m., Spencer Graves wrote:   Thanks.  I'm still having problems:         1.  I went to "github.com" and logged in with my standard GitHub account         2.  Then I clicked "+" in the upper right, just left of my GitHub ID icon, and selected "Import a

Re: [Rd] r-project.org dns

On 26/06/2019 21:13, Tim Keitt wrote: Sorry if this was already discussed. I notice that r-project.org is not found in dns lookups today. (At least for me -- I tried some online web look services as well.) THK We knew, but all the R listservers were also affected. The name servers in Vienna

[Rd] r-project.org dns

Sorry if this was already discussed. I notice that r-project.org is not found in dns lookups today. (At least for me -- I tried some online web look services as well.) THK [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

I think all 3 issues are solved by: 1. Use the "+" button on github.com and select "Import a repository". 2. Pass the URL of your SVN repo. Lionel > On 26 Jun 2019, at 18:58, Spencer Graves wrote: > > Thanks to Duncan, Lionel and Henrik for their quick replies. I

[R-pkg-devel] pandoc version used in winbuilder

All, How does one tell what version of pandoc is being used by winbuilder (and probably other related CRAN-submission processes)? I have a package with several HTML vignettes, for which I use a custom style. I had decided to add the pandoc option '-strip-comments' to my script (my vignettes