Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible to add an argument to the aggreagte
function to retain NA by categories?(default can not to in order to avoid
breaking code) Please see below example:
df = iris
df$Species[5] = NA
aggregate(`Petal.Width` ~ Species, df, sum) # does not include NA
Dear Steffen and Lori,
Steffen, many thanks for highlighting packages that are waiting review,
including our packages.
Lori, please, let us know what input you need from us to start the
reviewing process for the different packages (i.e. struct, structToolbox,
sbcms, pmp). We are keen on getting
Those are a special set of packages that were submitted by the same author
under a special circumstance. We are working with that author to work through
all the packages (which are related).
All other packages aim to have a review and response within 2-3 weeks.
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor
Le 20/11/2019 à 09:56, Hilmar Berger a écrit :
Hi Florian,
just a guess, but couldn't it be that the multiplication of very small
values leads to FP underflow exceptions which have to be handled by
BLAS in a less efficient way than "normal" multiplications handled by
SIMD instructions ?
Hi Florian,
just a guess, but couldn't it be that the multiplication of very small
values leads to FP underflow exceptions which have to be handled by BLAS
in a less efficient way than "normal" multiplications handled by SIMD
instructions ?
Best regards,
Hilmar
On 19/11/2019 15:09, Florian
Hi,
I think there is quite some backlog from September
https://github.com/Bioconductor/Contributions/labels/1.%20awaiting%20moderation
Maybe the BioC team can use the momentum to assign more reviewers ?
Yours,
Steffen
On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 19:07 +, Turaga, Nitesh wrote:
> No problem at
